With
every advancing sentence in
Matthew 5 (V21),
Jesus has taken an ever larger bite out of the human ego. Every new
contrast between the popular Pharisaic perversions and the real demand
of kingdom righteousness has served to heighten the moral challenge.
What the Lord at last commands in the sixth and last of these antitheses
must have stunned His audience
(Matthew 5:43-48).
He has spoken the inconceivable when He said, “but I say to you, love
your enemies”
(Matthew 5:44). To
many of His listeners, such counsel must have seemed not only
unthinkable, but impossible - and contrary to the very concept of
justice.
Now for the first time in
the sermon, Jesus has spoken the word which best sums up the principle
underlying the whole of His message. He has led His hearers up an
ascending plane from what love prohibits in the treatment of others
(even those who abuse us) to what love demands of us positively. And who
among His audience then or now could have anticipated that the journey
would not be finished until He had demanded of them the hardest thing of
all - to love the very ones we are most drawn to hate - our enemies.
Finally, the Lord has left no room for “self” at all.
“Enemy” was hardly a
foreign idea to first-century Jews. By Jesus’ time, there was a palpable
enmity that had attached itself to the partitioning wall that was the
law
(Ephesians 2:14-15).
The people of Israel had suffered much from a hostile world and often
looked with disdain upon the ignorant paganism and egregious immorality
of the Gentiles. The Gentiles were not slow to return the favor. The
Pharisees, with their separatist fervor, were not ignorant of the law’s
demand that the sons of the covenant were to love their neighbor as
themselves
(Leviticus 19:18),
but they understood that obligation to end at the borders of Israel.
There were plenty to hate beyond the pale and many in the nation held
that it was not only their privilege, but their obligation to do so. The
fact that the Pharisees were aware of the command to love, but
floundered on the definition of “neighbor” is evidenced by the
conversation with a certain lawyer
(Luke
10:25-29). The
lawyer knew that formula but was yet to make a proper application.
But how and why did the
teachers in Israel come to conclude that the law commanded hatred for
the enemy? It might have been the “holy wars” of extermination which God
commanded Israel to wage against the Canaanites
(Deuteronomy 20:16-18),
or the imprecatory psalms “Do not I hate them, O Lord, who hate You?...
I hate them with perfect hatred; I count them my enemies,”
Psalms
139:21-22. Note
especially
Psalm
109. Yet, however
difficult and perplexing be the problems which these facts present, the
law did not distinguish in the matter of neighbor love between the
Israelite and the stranger
(Leviticus 19:18 with 19:33-34),
and it did not counsel hatred and vengeance for the enemy
(Exodus 23:4-5).
Even Job, whose times most likely antedate the law, understood the sin
of rejoicing over the calamity of an enemy
(Job
31:29-30). It has
always impressed me that when Paul sought to instruct his brethren in
their treatment of enemies, he felt no need for some new revelation, but
drew easily upon the book of Proverbs: “If your enemy is hungry, feed
him, if he is thirsty, give him a drink”
(Romans 12:20; Proverbs 25:21).
There is no portion of the Old Testament which more directly addresses
the problem of Israel’s attitude toward her enemies than the book of
Jonah. The Assyrians were a brutal people, enemies of God and men, but
Jehovah loved them and He intended that His servant Jonah should do the
same
(Jonah
4:9-11).
Still, if after all this,
we find ourselves hard pressed to believe that the law did not counsel
enmity toward enemies, we are left to trust the Son of God who rebukes
this idea as a misconception of the law and wholly inconsistent with the
nature and purpose of God. It was just such teaching as this that made
the nation so unprepared for the coming of the peaceable kingdom. Had
Jesus told His followers to love their “neighbors,” they might well have
continued in the old narrow ways, missing completely this love’s unique
nature. But when He teaches them to love their enemies, they may be
startled but they will certainly be instructed. As Kierkegaard has
observed, the gospel has made it forever impossible for anyone to be
mistaken about the identity of his neighbor. If we are to love our
enemies, then there will certainly be no member of the human race,
however different, however distant, however vile, to which we will not
owe the best we can give him.
Other
Articles by Paul Earnhart
Who Is Jesus of Nazareth?
Sin Doesn't Work
The Search for Assurance
The Beatitudes: A Surprising Conclusion