Our claim to a
unique position in the religious world is our determination to follow the
Bible. But when this claim is made, the usual response is" "All churches
follow the Bible." This raises an obvious question: "If all churches follow
the Bible, why the variety of doctrines and practices?"
Unacceptable Explanations
Some say the
Bible cannot be understood sufficiently well to allow for unity. This
questions God's wisdom, for God intended for us to understand. "Be ye not
foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is"
(Eph. 5:17).
Was God incapable of providing a book that men could understand?
Others insist
that the Bible actually teaches many different things. Denominationalists
have been claiming this for years. More recently, we even heard a preacher
among churches of Christ say that the Bible can be used to justify different
kinds of church government. Sometimes it is said, "You can prove anything by
the Bible." This questions God's integrity. It is insulting to say of a man:
"You can prove anything by him." How much worse to say this of a book given
to us by God! It contains one consistent message and to make it support
contradictory positions requires an abuse of its message.
The Real Problem
The problem is
not with the Bible, nor with its source. The problem is the varying
approaches to following the Bible. Some believe in a careful adherence to
what the Bible says. Others believe in a rather casual following "not of the
letter, but of the Spirit," as they put it, adopting the words but not the
sense of
2 Corinthians 3:6.
Stated another way, some construe the Scriptures strictly, believing that we
must do in religion only what the Scriptures authorize. Others construe the
Scriptures loosely, believing that we may practice anything not plainly
forbidden.
These two views
formed a clear issue between the two great reformers of Germany and
Switzerland, Luther and Zwingli. A History of the Christian Church, Lars
Qualben explains: "One of the great differences between Zwingli and Luther
was: Luther used the Bible as corrective, retaining those rites and
ceremonies of the Medieval church which were not positively anti-scriptural.
Hence he retained images, altars, ornaments of the churches, organs, church
bells, and the like. Zwingli used the Bible as a code of laws, rejecting
everything not expressly enjoined in the Scriptures" (p. 255).
Following Recipes and Directions
If a teacher
gives a student a recipe for making a cake, what does she expect? If the
girl adds ingredients not found in the recipe, will the teacher credit her
with following the recipe? Obviously, the student was following the recipe
as long as she was using what the recipe required. But when she added other
ingredients, she ceased following the recipe and began following her own
way.
If a person is
given directions for finding a location, what is involved in following those
directions? As long as he is making the turns authorized, he is following
directions. But when he begins making turns not called for, he has ceased
following directions.
Are people
actually following the Bible as they follow recipes or directions? The
majority of ingredients in modern religion are nowhere authorized in
Scripture. They are the products of human wisdom. And it is these additional
ingredients, these unauthorized changes of directions that account for the
differences that exist in religion.
Other Articles by Sewell Hall
Learning
God's Will
The Flock of God
Love
Finds a Way
Dangerous
Preaching
Confusion and Transgression
Rearing Unselfish
Children
Five Smoot Stones of
Parenting
Why Do Churches of Christ
Differ So Widely?
Is Only One Church Right?
For Past Auburn Beacons go to:
www.aubeacon.com/Bulletins.htm
|
Anyone can join the mailing list for the Auburn Beacon! Send
your request to:
larryrouse@aubeacon.com |