The
Finger of indignation, with a touch of smugness, has been
pointed many times at a brother or sister who fell short of what
they should be. ``If that's what a Christian is, then I want no
part of it,'' says the accompanying voice.
But
the fact there are hypocrites in the church provides no
justification or hope for the sinner outside the church. It is
an exceedingly foolish argument. It is the equivalent of saying
that because a professed Christian fails on one point, and his
hypocrisy is so terrible that he (the indignant sinner) does not
want to be that bad, that he will deliberately reject God and
any profession of following his Maker.
That makes no sense! Think about it. The hypocrite is wrong and
will be condemned for it. He is lost, and without repentance
will be forever lost. So the sinner who feigns to be repelled by
such hypocrisy turns around and does what guarantees that he
will share a lost eternity with the hypocrite. He does not break
rank with him; he has in fact joined him.
Their difference is not one of substance, but of taste. It is
the silly and vain idea that he may be wrong and a sinner, but
at least his sin is not as bad as that of the hypocrite. And in
so rationalizing he becomes one with the hypocrite in serving
that which is evil and vile.
The
bottom line: the professed Christian's sin, no matter how ugly
and repulsive it may be, is no justification for you to
deliberately refuse to obey the Lord.
Other Articles
Potential Is Not Enough
How Do We Evaluate Our Entertainment Choices?
Standing Up For Our Brethren
The Christian and Social Media
Where Did we Fail?