Most
Christians will recognize the difficulties in Scripture over the subject
of drinking alcohol. On the one hand, there are passages that speak of
"wine" in positive terms
(Psalm
104:15; Ecc
10:19).
On the other hand, the warnings against strong drink, and
especially drunkenness, are clear and unequivocal
(Prov
20:1; 21:17; 23:30-31).
Drunkenness will keep one out of the kingdom of heaven
(Gal
5:21).
Drinking parties and the like are among the lusts of men from which
Christians are to refrain
(1
Pet 4:1-4).
Peter speaks of Christians being different enough in this respect that
the world thinks it strange that we don't do what they do.
There is
much to say about all these, and other, passages. The debate today that
rages is not whether people in biblical times drank something that could
have, in excess, gotten them drunk. Rather, the question is over whether
modern Christians have God's blessing to, or should, engage in "social
drinking." I am not discussing medical usage. I am discussing actual
drinking of alcohol for non-medical and recreational reasons. I don't
expect this debate to go away any time soon, but my purpose here is to
consider the issue from a wisdom perspective. What will godly wisdom
teach us about choices we make in our modern world relative to drinking
alcohol? One thing we can all agree on is this: drunkenness is sinful
and will destroy a soul.
I bring up
the following issues because anyone thinking about drinking needs to
consider the implications of the practice. The biblical warnings are
strong enough that anyone considering this should exercise great care
and concern before participating in or advocating a practice that could
devastate souls and families. This isn't just about whether we can find
passages here and there that support or deny a position given a variety
of contexts. God's word is meant to give us wisdom to discern right from
wrong
(Heb
5:14).
In the face of difficulties, we need to think things out and decide,
with wisdom from above, whether or not this is an activity Christians
ought to be involved in today. Following are some principles that I keep
in mind and urge others to consider:
1. Drunkenness is a process, not just a state. At
what point do you call a person drunk? One doesn't just drink and drink,
unaffected, then suddenly is drunk at the next sip. It takes time for
the alcohol to take effect. Further, the point at which one is drunk is
person-dependent, and the only way to know when too much has been
imbibed is to test it out. In other words, you will never know your
limits on this until you've exceeded them. Does this sound wise? Even
law enforcement today will charge someone with DUI over a small
percentage of a difference in the level of alcohol in one's system. And
isn't it interesting that the person getting drunk usually won't think
he is drunk? Alcohol (and other drugs) breaks down inhibitions and warps
one's ability to make sound judgments. One of those warped judgments is
just how sober one really is while in the process of drinking.
Now I
realize that this same problem would have been around in biblical times.
However, see the next point.
2. The reasons for drinking today are not exactly the
same as in ancient times. We
can find passages that speak favorably of "wine," but should all of
these be equated to our modern circumstances? They didn't have a great
deal of variety when it came to quenching a thirst, and their water
wasn't exactly the healthiest option unless something that could kill
any threats therein was added. It wasn't always just about the taste;
usually the alcohol was diluted. With as much emphasis as some will put
on understanding the ancient culture as so important to understanding
any given text, I find it odd that they won't say the same when it comes
to the passages dealing with alcohol. If our circumstances today were
identical to the ancients, that would be one thing. But when it comes to
drink and thirst quenching, it is not quite the same.
3. In connection with the above, the alcohol industry of
the ancient world was not what it is today either. I'm
sure that people might have made money selling fermented juice, but it
wasn't a multi-billion dollar industry that depends upon people,
including those with real problems, buying and consuming their products.
Distilled liquor is not equivalent to ancient drinks. I seriously doubt
that you would have seen billboards advertising the glories of the
product. While "wine" is used to translate a number of Hebrew and Greek
terms that includes the juice still in the grape to the stronger stuff,
you still wouldn't have had the vast array of choices found in modern
liquor stores. People could certainly get drunk back then, and they did,
but it was not nearly the type of industry being flaunted today. What
does this have to do with it all? Simply this. Drinking fermented juice
with alcoholic content, typically diluted, was part of a daily culture
that had little choice in drinks and needed its water content doctored.
I don't doubt that it would have tasted good and refreshing to them, but
I do doubt that the typical person would have normally gotten drunk,
which is why the drinking parties warned about would have been
significant. I just don't believe our cultures compare very well in this
respect. I may be wrong, but I need to see more evidence that shows
comparable cultures in these areas.
4. Alcoholism today is a real and serious problem that is
never helped by anyone flaunting the right to drink. If
Romans 14 teaches anything, it is that we must not use any perceived
rights to the detriment of our brothers and sisters for whom Christ
died. If someone is struggling with alcoholism, we must respond with
compassion and a desire to help. It is bad enough that this person, even
after receiving help, may well be tempted by the mere suggestion. The
fact is that alcoholism is a serious, recognized problem today, and it
is often attended with other debilitating issues like depression (as the
recent situation with Robin Williams would show). I cannot be party to
that, especially since it is so unnecessary today.
5. If you have never been around a real drinker and
witnessed first hand the havoc drinking can bring into a home, then you
ought to educate yourself about this problem. I
have seen it first hand, and it's not pretty. Homes have been destroyed.
Many lives have been lost. Honestly, it angers me when I see billboards
depicting some "man of distinction" holding his alcohol and acting as if
this is the life. They won't show you the highway wrecks (not something
you would have seen in the ancient world), the shed blood, the
devastated homes and children, just because someone wanted to be a "man
of distinction." You may say that this doesn't "prove" it's wrong, and
no, it doesn't. But neither can we afford to ignore the fact that
alcohol consumption has done untold damage to modern families and
society. You can justify drinking all you wish, and you can point to
this or that passage, but I refuse to throw in with something that is
both so unnecessary and so destructive in our modern context. If you are
going to favor drinking, then you need to be familiar with the problems
that can arise from it. You may think you can handle it, but what
alcoholic today began drinking without thinking that he can handle it?
You have to ask if that unnecessary risk of 1) starting down a path that
may destroy you, your family, and others, and 2) influencing another
that cannot handle it, is worth your public support. No non-drinker
becomes a problem drinker until he starts drinking. But now why exactly
does someone want to start drinking? Why today?
6. The comparisons between drinking alcohol and other
"bad habits" just doesn't work, unless we are actually talking about
drugs that significantly alter sobriety and the ability to make sound
judgments. There
are plenty of those types of drugs, but comparing drinking to eating
donuts is ludicrous. We aren't just talking here about long-term health.
We are talking about the immediate effects that destroys one's ability
to think. If eating donuts does that to you, then by all means quit
eating them. But I have yet to meet the person who destroyed a family or
killed someone in a car wreck over losing one's mind on donuts. If that
kind of comparison is the justification for drinking today, then sell it
elsewhere.
7. With the above principles in mind, I simply ask
myself:
Is it the right thing to do today?
Is it the wise thing to do today?
Is it something that will glorify God today?
Is it something that will strengthen my family today?
Is it something that will yield a proper influence on others today?
Is it something that will keep my thinking sharp and focused on the
Kingdom?
Is it something that will enable my faith to grow stronger?
Is it something that I am comfortable doing in the Lord's presence?
Is it something that I am comfortable doing with the Lord present in me?
Now one
might say, "You can apply those questions to many activities." So be it.
But that doesn't change the topic under consideration right now that
involves something that has been proven to be so mind-altering,
destructive, and deadly. Just consider. The choices we make about this
issue can, in the most literal sense, mean life or death.
Other Articles by
Doy Moyer
Was Jesus Literally
Forsaken?
Baptism and the Blood
The Problem With Creeds