Did the Father literally forsake Jesus
at the cross? The aramaic phrase spoken by Jesus on the cross,
translated "My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?" is often taken to
mean just that (Matt. 27:46). Generally, the idea is that since
Jesus was made to be sin on our behalf (2 Cor. 5:21), then it was
necessary for Him to suffer a form of spiritual death - separation from
the Father. This was the penalty paid by Jesus. Proof of this is seen in
the phrase under question, along with 2 Corinthians 5:21.
Granted, a brief look at the phrase,
spoken at that particular time, lends itself to the conclusion that
Jesus really was forsaken by the Father. It perhaps makes sense to think
that the penalty Jesus had to pay on our behalf is a temporary spiritual
separation from the Father. So we reason. But this conclusion is really
based upon two things: 1) the phrase under question, and 2) our own
reasoning and speculation as to how Jesus bore our sins. Other than
this, the Bible nowhere says in any explicit sense that Jesus was
forsaken. I believe it is just the opposite.
My conviction is that Jesus was not
literally forsaken by the Father as He was on the cross. I want to list
a few items that ought to be considered in coming to a conclusion about
this issue. As I do this, I realize that not every question can be
answered. I do not pretend to know or understand everything that
happened between Jesus and the Father. All of the workings of deity are
not made known to us; and we should be very careful about speculating
about these things (e.g., saying that the 3-hour darkness must have
signified God's withdrawal of fellowship from Jesus; such is pure
speculation). I think we can consider a few points about this, and even
give some thought as to how this has any application to us. So, here
goes.
1. The
consequence of the position is not very attractive. Think
about it. Jesus came to do the will of the Father, which involved His
suffering and death on the cross (Heb. 10:5-10). Jesus carried
out the Father's will with absolute perfection. Not a single instance of
sin can be named in His life. And in the context of speaking about His
death, Jesus said, "And He who sent Me is with Me; He has not left Me
alone, for I always do the things that are pleasing to Him" (Jn.
8:29). Now if the Father did actually forsake Jesus on the cross,
then this means that it is possible for God to forsake one who has done
everything asked of him. That's not a very pleasant thought; I don't
think we can afford to think of God in this way. If God the Father could
forsake One who never sinned, what about those of us who have sinned and
been forgiven? This does not prove the case, but it is a consequence to
be reckoned with.
2. Paying the
price for our sins did not necessitate spiritual separation of the
Father and the Son. In response to the first point, someone
might think, "But Jesus was paying the price for sin; doesn't that
change things?" The question is, did Jesus become guilty of those sins,
or was he paying a redemptive price for the sins? If He became guilty of
the sins, then yes, separation from the Father would have occurred. But
if not, and He was simply paying a price of redemption, then spiritual
separation was not necessary.
In paying the price for our sins, Jesus
did for us what we could not do for ourselves. If the price was
temporary separation from the Father, then the sacrifice only did what
we all have already experienced. Since all have sinned, all have been
spiritually separated from God. If Jesus came to do that, then He only
experienced what we have already suffered. It should be obvious that
Jesus did not pay for sins in the way I would have had to pay for those
sins myself. Thus, the price Jesus paid was not:
a. Temporary separation. We've
already suffered that. If this is the sacrifice made by Jesus, then we
have already paid the price.
b. Eternal separation. That's
obvious enough, since Jesus is in heaven (Col. 3:1). But if He died
separated from the Father, how could He have gone to Paradise (Luke
23:43)? At what point did Jesus lose fellowship with the Father; and at
what point did He regain it? Nothing in the Bible indicates either of
these. To say that Jesus was abandoned by the Father demands speculation
as to when He was forsaken, and when He was taken back into fellowship.
Lack of passages on these points should prevent us from such
speculation.
3. When we look
at the various passages that speak of the price paid by Jesus, they
point to the blood shed by Jesus as a sin-offering. Jesus is
the lamb slain before the foundation of the world (Rev. 13:8). It
is with His precious blood that we are redeemed (1 Pet. 1:18-19).
It is through the shedding of that blood that we are forgiven (Eph.
1:7). I believe this is the import of the idea that Jesus was "made
sin" (2 Cor. 5:21), and that He became "a curse" for us. He was
not literally sin, but He was made a sin-offering. Jesus did not become
guilty of the sins anymore than the animals involved in the Old
Testament sacrifices became literally guilty. The shedding of the blood
became the means of forgiveness and the way by which the wrath of God
was appeased. In contrast to the animals, Jesus came to do the will of
God. "By this will we have been sanctified through the offering of the
body of Jesus Christ once for all" (Heb. 10:10). None of the
passages indicate that the sacrifice of Jesus included a spiritual
separation from the Father, or a forsaking of the Son by the Father.
There is no question that Jesus suffered spiritually and emotionally.
But, it appears that His greatest emotional pain was being experienced
in the garden before He actually went to the cross (Luke 22:44).
These passages show that the Father aided Him through His angels. Jesus
was in pain, even though not abandoned.
4. Now, what
about the phrase itself: "My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me"?
The key to the use of the phrase by Jesus is to be found in its source.
This phrase begins the well-known Psalm 22. By quoting the first
line of the Psalm, Jesus was appropriating the message of the Psalm to
Himself. A look at this psalm shows that the one who uttered this phrase
was not literally forsaken by God. Note the following:
a. The psalm can be broken down into two
major parts: 1. Forsaken by God (vv. 1-21), and 2. Delivered by
God (vv. 22-31). The psalm begins with the desperate phrase
quoted by Jesus, but as it proceeds it expresses a victorious assurance
of deliverance.
b. In the psalm, the quoted phrase does
not intend to express the idea that God has literally and actually
forsaken anyone. The forsaking is in appearance, not in reality. The
psalm fits quite well with all of the events that were happening when
Jesus was on the cross. We should not see the words of Jesus on the
cross in a vacuum, for other parts of the psalm fit with the events of
the cross; other prophecies are fulfilled (e.g., vv. 7-8, 16-18).
Verses 7-8 express exactly what happened with those who mocked
and sneered at Jesus. They did not think that God would deliver Jesus
because He appeared so despised and smitten by God. It was the people
who esteemed Jesus to be smitten and afflicted by God (Isa. 53:4).
c. The psalm shows that, in reality, the
one uttering the cry has been heard. Verse 22 marks a change from
defeat to victory. And notice verse 24: "For He has not despised
nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; nor has He hidden His face
from him; but when he cried to Him for help, He heard."
d. Thus the phrase uttered by Jesus,
taken from this psalm, was not intended to convey the idea that the
Father actually forsook Him. It did convey the idea that He appeared
forsaken, but if the hearers knew the psalm from which Jesus quoted,
they would also need to think of the victory expressed in the latter
part it. And I find it interesting that just before Jesus "gave up His
spirit," He said, "It is finished." This statement coincides with the
last verse of Psalm 22, referring to the fact that God has
"performed it," i.e., that God has carried out justice and finished the
work of providing for salvation for all of mankind (vv. 25-31).
In dying on the cross, Jesus carried out this work. He finished the work
that God had promised and foretold so long before.
5. When Jesus uttered the cry, "My God,
My God, why have You forsaken Me?" He was not asking for an answer. If
we take it to literally mean that God forsook Jesus, then we would also
have to take it to mean that Jesus didn't know why. He was referring to
Psalm 22 as the fulfillment of the prophecy. The use of that
phrase in the psalm itself does not lend anything to the concept that
Jesus literally was forsaken. Rather, it points to the victorious nature
of God's deliverance in the midst of a time that appeared so dismal and
forlorn. Jesus was not forsaken. He was simply awaiting the deliverance
that He knew the Father would provide. Now if one uses Jesus' words on
the cross to say that the Father literally forsook Jesus, it would need
to be proved that Jesus intended those words to convey something
different than the way it is used in the Psalm.
Is There An Application For Us?
This is not just an academic exercise.
The psalm, and its use by Jesus, has a tremendous meaning for us as
God's people. What are some lessons we can learn and apply?
1. When times
are so difficult that it seems no one cares, we have assurance that God
is there for us. We are not promised that everything on this
earth will be free of difficulties, but we are promised that God will
never leave us nor forsake us (Heb. 13:5-6). This psalm can be of
great comfort to us when things do not appear to be going too well. We
can expect God's deliverance.
2. God hears
and answers our cries. Sometimes we cry to God out of despair and wonder
if He is really listening. The answer of this psalm is a
resounding "yes." God hears and will deliver, even if we feel alone.
3. It is okay
to express our desperate feelings to God. He wants us to cast our cares
upon Him (1 Pet. 5:6-7).
4. Because of
what God accomplished through Jesus, we are blessed beyond all of our
imaginations. So now we can praise God, be satisfied, worship
Him, and tell the coming generations what marvelous works He has
performed. Because of what God has done, we have a great victory in
Christ (Rom. 8:31ff).
I realize that not everyone will agree
with my brief analysis of the phrase and the psalm. But I think that it
is very inadequate to just look at the phrase as Jesus was on the cross
and not give some consideration to the psalm from which it comes. The
psalm seems so entirely messianic that we cannot overlook it in our
interpretation of the phrase.
I hope that these thoughts will
encourage further study.
Other Articles