Every Christian believes in the binding power of an
implication, including those who deny that implications have any binding
power. How so?
First, anyone who is a Christian today is one because of
the acceptance of the implication that people of all places and all
times ought to be Christians. After all, where is there a direct
statement telling us that 21st century Americans should be Christians?
We infer that Christianity was intended to be taken beyond the
boundaries of the first century time-frame. If you are a Christian, do
you believe this inference is necessary? If you don’t believe any
inferences are necessary, then on what basis are you a Christian?
Second, when we follow particular commands in Scripture,
we do so because we have inferred that those commands are viable and
vital for those beyond the original audience who first heard them. That
these commands are viable and vital is evident, but if we believe we
should be following particular commands that were given to the Roman,
Corinthian, or Colossian Christians, then we do so on the basis of what
is implied by Scripture and what we infer as interpreters. Are these
inferences necessary? Are any inferences necessary?
Now let’s look at a case in point. Take the statement by
Jesus that the greatest commandment is to love God with all your heart,
soul, strength, and mind
(Matt 22:34-40; Mark 12:28-34).
Would anyone deny that this is still the greatest commandment? I surely
wouldn’t. But if you believe it is still the greatest commandment, then
on what basis do you believe it? Why ask this? Because it illustrates
the power of an implication.
1. In context (and context is vital), Jesus was speaking
about the Law and the Prophets. He said nothing, in that context, about
the New Covenant. So if it is to be understood beyond the Hebrew
Scriptures (the Old Covenant), then we are inferring its necessity
beyond the original context and the original audience.
2. This command is not stated this way anywhere else in
the New Covenant Scriptures. There are plenty of passages telling us to
love one another. There are plenty of passages telling us to love God.
But that loving God with all the heart, soul, strength, and mind is the
greatest commandment? Where is that? The only place that is found is in
a passage that contextually is speaking of the Law and the Prophets.
3. Where, even in the Hebrew Scriptures, does it say that
loving God with all the heart, soul, strength, and mind is the greatest
of the commandments? Yes, the command is there
(Deut 6:4).
But it doesn’t say it is the greatest commandment there. How were they
to know this? If they were expected to know it, then they knew it by
what is implied in the command. Interestingly enough, some did get it.
For example, that lawyer who asked Jesus about inheriting eternal life
answered the question correctly
(Luke 10:25-29).
How did he know that inheriting eternal life was so connected to loving
God with all the heart? That is not stated in Deuteronomy 6. Where does
that passage say anything about “eternal life”? Yet, Jesus said that the
lawyer answered his own question correctly. That must have been a pretty
significant inference. Was it a necessary one? Was it a binding one?
Do you believe in the power of an implication? If you are
a Christian, and you believe that loving God with all your heart is
indeed the greatest commandment today, then you believe in the power of
implication, and you have inferred that this is necessary for you.
Indeed, it is exactly what needs to be inferred.
So, really, the question is not whether implications and
inferences (even necessary ones) are an important part of our
understanding of the Scriptures. What we need to make sure of is that
what we infer is reasonable, not forced.
Other Articles by Doy Moyer
The Logic of Authority
Baptism and the Blood
Was Jesus Literally Forsaken?
The Problem With Creeds
It Is What It Is