Solomon once wrote that
“there is no new thing under the sun”
(Ecc
1:9). Certainly
that saying is true with reference to the arguments that a swelling
“progressive” element within the church is employing in defense of the
idea that the use of musical instruments is permissible in Christian
worship. Or at the very least, they allege, the issue is not one that
should prevent fellowship between churches of Christ and denominational
groups that use the instrument.
Professors in several
colleges are attempting to argue this case, and a number of churches
already have begun incorporating the instrument into their services. An
even greater number contends that the matter is of no consequence, and
there is little doubt that these will have the instrument in the
not-distant future.
It once was the case that
those who advocated the instrument attempted to make arguments that were
at least remotely related to the biblical text. But those arguments
proved to be so baseless that most of them have been abandoned. The
mantra now appears to be that stale quip, “The Bible doesn’t say, ‘don’t
do it.’”
One cannot but believe
that with some of these folks it would not matter if the Bible
explicitly stated, “You must not use mechanical music in Christian
worship.” They would do it anyway, for they are “will-worshippers”
(Col
2:23) who are
enamored with carnality, rather than truth.
Imagine for a moment the
following scenario. A man takes his car into an automotive repair shop.
He informs the proprietor that the vehicle is not running smoothly and
he wants a tune-up. When the customer returns the following day, he is
presented with a bill for more than $2,000. In addition to the tune-up,
the repairman installed new brakes, a muffler, a carburetor, a fuel
pump, and a new set of tires. The customer is enraged and protests: “I
did not authorize these extra expenditures!” “I know that,” the mechanic
responds, “but you did not say
not
to do it.” Suppose the case is taken to court. How do you reckon a judge
would rule?
The issue is one of
authority. While we recognize that there are many laws in the Bible that
are explicitly negative, one may not draw the inference that everything
is
permitted that is
not
specifically condemned.
In the table of the Ten
Commandments, the Lord said regarding “graven images,” i.e., idol gods,
“you shall not bow yourself down to them”
(Exodus 20:5). But
what if some renegade Hebrew simply “stood” before an idol and prayed?
Do you suppose that if he had done such, and made the defense, “He said,
‘don’t bow’; he didn’t say, ‘don’t stand’”? Do you suppose the Lord
would have been impressed with such a depraved defense?
Can reasonable people not
mentally anticipate the logical consequence of this type of reasoning?
It throws wide open the gates of apostasy. Consider the following
questions that surely could be posed by modern innovators.
· Why
can’t we pray to Mary and the saints? The Bible doesn’t explicitly
condemn it.
· Why
can’t we observe communion on Saturday? The Bible doesn’t say not to.
· Why
can’t we have Pepsi and pizza for communion? The Bible doesn’t forbid
it.
· Why
can’t we baptize babies? The New Testament doesn’t censure it.
· Why
can’t we smoke marijuana in worship? No text prohibits it.
It has become
increasingly apparent that not only do we see a new generation emerging
that knows practically nothing about the Scriptures, largely it is a
people that cannot reason. Logic, to them, is a like an alien language.
For many, their entire
religious emphasis (under a leaky umbrella they call “spiritual”) is one
of feelings, self-centeredness, and an appeal to the carnal.
Other Articles by Wayne Jackson
Tradition Verses Scripture
Baby Dedication Ceremonies: Expediency or
Innovation?
Did
the Early Church Observe the Lord's Supper Daily?
The
New Testament Pattern of Giving