Today, we hear the expression "confrontation
or, negotiation" used often in the civil realm concerning our
relationship with rulers of foreign countries. It is an interesting idea
as far as political diplomacy is concerned. I endorse this approach in
strictly material relationships in a sincere effort to ward off a
holocaust that would destroy a vast portion of humanity. However, in the
religious realm, the idea of "negotiation" with leaders of religious
error is repugnant to anyone who loves the truth. "Negotiation" is "a
conferring, discussing, or bargaining to reach agreement" (Webster's New
World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition). To me,
negotiation is a form of compromise, "a settlement in which each side
gives up some demands or makes concessions" (Ibid.).
Compromise in religion is severely condemned
in the word of God, in both Old and New Testaments. I suggest the reader
refer to Ezra 4 and Neh. 4:6. In these passages, we read
of the attempts at compromise by the "adversaries" of God's people.
Notice Ezra 4:2: "Then they came to Zerubbabel and to the chief
of the fathers, and said unto them, Let us build with you: for we seek
your God, as ye do; and we do sacrifice unto him since the days of
Esarhaddon king of Assur, which brought us up hither." Note their
response (Ezra 4:3): "But Zerubbabel and Jeshua, and the rest of
the chief of the fathers of Israel said unto them, Ye have nothing to do
with us to build an house unto our God: but we ourselves together will
build unto the Lord God of Israel as king Cyrus the king of Persia hath
commanded us." The malicious reaction of the adversaries is set forth in
verses four through six; the letter they composed and sent to Artaxerxes
accusing the Jews to him is stated in verses eleven through sixteen.
This shows the maliciousness of leaders of religious error when their
attempts at compromise are spurned by children of God. Read also Neh.
4-6 for additional attempts of the adversaries of God's people on the
other side of the cross to compromise.
In the fifteenth chapter of Matthew,
there seems to have been a disposition of the disciples of Christ to
compromise with the Pharisees from Jerusalem. There was a mild rebuke of
Jesus when they asserted (verse twelve): "Knowest thou that the
Pharisees were offended after they heard this saying?" (i.e. Jesus'
rebuke of the Pharisees for their hypocrisy and perversion of the law,
verses 3-9). Now, notice Jesus' answer: "Every plant which my
heavenly father hath not planted shall be rooted up. Let them alone:
they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind,
both shall fall into the ditch." By "let them alone," He meant: Don't
you apologize or compromise! This reminds me of some professed
Christians today: "Just preach the gospel and let others alone! Let us
just preach the Bible." Now, whenever you hear such pleas, you can rest
assured that here are people who are not converted to Christ! They do
not want religious error and the perpetrators thereof exposed. It would
be interesting to hear these "bleeding hearts" explain how one can
preach the gospel and let others alone! One cannot even preach Christ as
the Son of God and let others alone; unbelieving Jews would be offended!
One cannot preach the existence of Jehovah and let others alone; the
atheist would be offended. Such compromising attitudes are nauseous to
lovers of truth to say nothing of being anti-scriptural!
Jesus did not let the unbelieving Jews alone
(read Matt. 23). Paul did not let the false teacher, a Jew named
Bar-jesus, alone (Acts 13:4-12). No, Paul "confronted" Bar-jesus
("confront: 1. to face, stand, or meet face to face. 2. to face boldly,
defiantly, antagonistically. . ." Webster's New World Dictionary of the
American Language, College Edition). The record says that Bar-jesus the
sorcerer "withstood them seeking to turn the deputy from the faith. Then
Paul set his eyes on him, and said, O full of all subtilty and mischief,
thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not
cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord? And now behold the hand of
the Lord is upon thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a
season. . ." (Acts 13:8-11). Bar-jesus was already spiritually
blind, as are all false teachers. In Acts 15 there is the inspired
account of Paul and Barnabus' disputation (confrontation) with the
Judaizing teachers that came from Judea teaching falsehoods. They did
not "steal away" sweetly and let them alone! Neither did they attempt to
deal with them "diplomatically" and "slip up on their blind side" in a
vain attempt to show them the error of their way over a long period of
time while their heresy would be eating away at the life blood of the
saints.
The only examples I find in the Bible
concerning the proper attitude toward and exposd of sin is direct
confrontation. When radical surgery is needed to remove a malignancy,
there is no time for procrastination, no "dilly-dallying" with false
teachers either without or within the church of our Lord. Those who
would compromise the truth of the gospel, who attempt to placate false
teachers and their deceived followers, must be confronted by the
faithful people of God. When Jude wrote to the saints in the first
century, he exhorted them to "contend earnestly for the faith once for
all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3). My brethren, this battle
cry still rings out to us who compose the body of Christ. If we do not
respond and fight against every wicked scheme and doctrine of men, then
just who will? "For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the
flesh. . .Casting down imaginations (reasonings) and every high thing
that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into
captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ. . ." (2 Cor.
10:3, 5).
Brethren, whether it is against
perverters of the gospel of Christ on the outside of Christ who are
denying His plan for redemption and the church or against false teachers
and compromisers within who promote and defend .human institutionalism
among churches of Christ or who encourage "ecumenism" by extending
fellowship to religious groups who do not "walk by faith," we must
contend earnestly for the faith or no one will! Let us unsheath the
sword and get on with the job.
Truth Magazine - May 22,
1975
Other Articles
A Church Treasury --- Only in an
Emergency?
Delighting In God
Church Government -- All Alike?
I Was Wrong