Job, the great patriarch of ancient Uz,
stands like a beacon light amidst the “tragedy” figures of literary
history. The drama of his life is fairly well known. In terms of
character, he was a spiritual giant. The inspired record describes him
as one who was “perfect [spiritually mature] and upright.” He revered
God and attempted to abstain from sinful living (1:1).
In addition to his spiritual qualities, the
Creator had blessed him with material prosperity. He owned vast herds of
livestock; indeed, he was “the greatest of all the children of the east”
(1:3). Truly, the sage of Uz was one of the significant characters of
the initial era of human history.
The Theological Significance
Jehovah was proud of Job. He was a trophy
among humanity. Hence, on a certain occasion (the details of which are
not revealed), the Lord challenged Satan: “Have you considered my
servant Job...?” Immediately the malicious enemy responded: “Does Job
serve God for nothing?” (1:9). The devil then proceeded to slanderously
charge that the patriarch’s piety was solely out of self-interest. In
other words, Jehovah bribed fidelity out of Job.
The subtle implication was this: “You, God,
are not worthy of human service on the basis of your own merit; rather,
you must pay for it.” The whole of the book of Job, in reality, is a
response to this charge. Not because the Lord, for his own sake, needed
to defend himself. No, this great spiritual battle was for our benefit.
The Test
In order to demonstrate the concept that
there is such a thing as selfless devotion, Jehovah allowed Satan to
afflict Job. He was assaulted in every area of human vulnerability.
First, he lost his economic security. He went from riches to rags
overnight. Second, Job’s ten children were killed in a single day by a
terrible storm. Though deeply grieved, the remarkable man of faith
simply blessed the name of his God (1:21).
But Satan was far from finished. Irate that
Job had maintained his integrity (2:3), the Tempter suggested that if
the patriarch’s body were afflicted, such would reveal the truth about
his superficial dedication. Accordingly, Jehovah agreed to Job’s testing
in that fashion. The patriarch of Uz was smitten with inflammation from
the soles of his feet to the crown of his head. He became a despicable
bag of rotting flesh. The devil had been allowed to take virtually
everything—prosperity, offspring, and now health. Only one thing
remained—his wife. Beware of any gift offered by Satan!
That Woman
At the height of his anguish, Mrs. Job
spoke: “Do you still hold fast your integrity?” she asked, with obvious
exasperation. And then, astonishingly, she suggested: “Curse God and
die” (2:9, KJV). The ASV renders the phrase: “Renounce God and die.”
The term rendered “curse” is actually a
flexible word that can signify either to “bless” or “curse,” depending
upon the context. It was a common form of greeting which could be
employed to say “hello” or “good-bye.” Job’s wife most likely was
suggesting (as evidenced by his subsequent rebuke) that he say
“good-bye” to God. Perhaps she anticipated this would produce a violent
reaction in the Lord. He then would kill Job for such an outburst, and
so put an end to the patriarch’s misery. Whatever the motive, her words
reveal much about her defective faith.
Sober reflection, we believe, can lead one
to draw several possible conclusions relative to the spiritual stability
of Job’s companion. We would suggest the following as food for thought.
First, while it may be the case that Mrs.
Job was urging her husband to renounce totally his faith in God, as some
suggest (Smick, 886), it is possible that her admonition merely
questions the nature of God, to the effect: “He certainly is not the
sort of God you perceived him to be. Abandon him.”
Second, if it is the case that Mrs. Job
retained a remnant of belief in the objective existence of God, she
certainly had a distorted view of his real nature. Let us explore this
momentarily.
Job’s spouse may have concluded that whereas
there was some evidence to warrant the conclusion that a Supreme Being
exists, in view of the present circumstance, there was nothing to
suggest that he cares for suffering humanity. She might have adopted a
rather deistic position, namely that Jehovah created man, but then left
him on his own. He was a cold, uncaring God.
The Contrast
We must remind ourselves that in these
difficult times of trial, Job’s wife had lost much—just as he had. When
he lost his wealth, hers was gone as well. When his children were
killed, she was left childless also. Perhaps none of us has ever
experienced such a degree of soul ravagement. When emotion is set aside,
however, one fact remains: Job retained a strong faith; his wife did
not. Consider the patriarch’s retort: “What? Shall we receive good at
the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?” (2:10b). A couple of
technical points need discussion.
First, the term “evil” does not necessarily
connote that which is morally wrong; rather, it can refer to anything
“bad” that happens. Andersen (93) observes that the Hebrew word does not
suggest “wickedness” on God’s part (cf. Isa. 45:7; Amos 3:6).
Second, Meredith Kline (464) notes that the
term “receive” means to receive meekly and patiently. He cites a
Canaanite proverb from the Amarna Letters which describes certain ants,
who when smitten, do not “receive” such passively; rather, they bite
back. Job’s patience is cited in the New Testament (Jas. 5:11).
By way of contrast, Mrs. Job’s faith was in
tatters. She suggests her husband would be better off with Providence
out of his life. Job remonstrates. He says she speaks like a “foolish”
woman. The Hebrew adjective can carry the ideas of both “senselessness”
and “wickedness,” or perhaps here, an insensitivity toward God. It can
also describe the disposition of one who mocks at those who trust God
(Pan, 12).
Let me call attention to what I believe were
some fundamental mistakes which led to the demise of Mrs. Job’s faith.
Lack of Preparation
While one is not unsympathetic to her pain,
Mrs. Job’s blasphemy (i.e., her admonition that he “curse” God) is
inexcusable. The facts indicate that she had not made adequate
preparation for this time of “evil,” i.e., hardship, in her life
(2:10b).
This point cannot be stressed too
rigorously. Complete trust in God, in the dark periods of one’s life,
does not happen by accident. Just as the axe is prepared for the blows
it must endure by the fires of the forge, just so, the heart of man must
be “tempered” for the trials of the future. Deep spirituality, such as
expressed by Job, is the result of walking with the Lord on a sustained
basis. Let me bring this over to our own day and make a more practical
application.
Spiritual strength is attained in a variety
of ways. One must nourish his soul “day and night” (Psa. 1:2) with the
instruction that derives from the Creator of the universe. This, of
course, has been codified in the narratives of Scripture. David
exclaimed: “Your word have I laid up in my heart, that I might not sin
against you” (Psa. 119:11).
Too, one must take advantage of every
possible occasion to immerse his spirit in acts of worshipful devotion.
Prayer and praise, both as an individual and in corporate settings, are
of paramount importance. Additionally, one must seek out the
companionship of others of strong faith, and feed upon their strengths.
Finally, busily ministering to the needs of
others, rather than focusing upon one’s own problems, is a great
antidote against self-pity and the temptation to surrender one’s faith.
Job’s wife was unprepared for the hardships which befell her. Such was a
mistake. Preparation is a personal responsibility.
Lack of Perspective
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that
there was a certain arrogance to Mrs. Job’s demeanor. She had analyzed
her husband’s circumstances (as well as her own, no doubt) and concluded
that God was irrelevant to the situation. Either he did not care about
their plight, or else was impotent to do anything about it. She had
concluded that there was no virtue in this misery; hence, the best
remedy was to bid Jehovah adieu, and let the “chips fall” where they
might.
Had she known the full story, namely that
there was purpose in Job’s calamity, she might not have been so
presumptuous.
First, as we have noted already, Job’s
reaction to his suffering was a glorious testimony to the character of
the man. The patriarch’s crowning statement was: “Though he slay me, yet
will I trust him” (13:15).
Second, while Job maintained his faith, he
did lose some balance; he became fixated on his own innocence , rather
than unreservedly contending for the justice of God. This was Elihu’s
point: “he justified himself rather than God” (32:2). His attitude
needed some adjustment.
Surely we ought to learn from this
magnificent narrative. We may not understand the meaning of suffering in
our own life. Perhaps it is self-caused (1 Pet. 4:14). Maybe it is the
result of the cause-and-effect procedures in God’s orderly universe (Lk.
13:4). It could be permitted in order to strengthen us (Jas. 1:2-4).
The point is: From our microscopic vantage
point, we don’t know enough to criticize our Maker, and it is the
epitome of egotism when we do.
Materialism
Finally, it is obvious that Mrs. Job was
intellectually afflicted with a form of materialism. She appears to have
entertained the notion that if her husband could but die, his suffering
(at the tolerance of this uncaring God) would end. Curse God? End all
suffering? Not hardly.
Job himself had contemplated the matter. “If
a man die, shall he live again?” (14:14). He had at least some hope that
the Lord would “hide [him] in Sheol” until divine “wrath be past”; that
Jehovah would “appoint [him] a set time, and remember [him]” again
(14:13). The patriarch did believe that in some future existence beyond
death, he would be vindicated (19:23ff). For a more thorough
consideration of this passage, see the article, Job’s Redeemer.
A renunciation of God does not end human
difficulties; it only compounds them. It exposes the rebel to an
ultimate reckoning that is far more horrible than the worst earthly
torment we can imagine. Death only terminates earth’s scenes; there is a
future accountability for one’s conduct after death (Rom. 14:12). There
is a punishment “worse” than death (Heb. 10:28-29).
Let us not make the deadly mistake made by
Mrs. Job. May we trust God to manage his world, and acknowledge that our
current sufferings soon will be replaced with an incomparable glory
(Rom. 8:18).
Works Cited
Andersen, Francis. 1974. Job. InterVarsity:
Downer’s Grove, IL.
Kline, Meredith G. 1962. “Job,” Wycliffe
Bible Commentary. Moody: Chicago, IL.
Pan, Chou-Wee. 1997. Dictionary of Old
Testament Theology & Exegesis. Willem VanGemeren, ed. Vol. 3. Zondervan:
Grand Rapids, MI.
Smick, Elmer. 1988. The Expositor’s Bible
Commentary. Zondervan: Grand Rapids, MI.
Scripture References
Isaiah 45:7; Amos 3:6; James 5:11; Psalm
1:2; Psalm 119:11; 1 Peter 4:14; Luke 13:4; James 1:2-4; Romans 14:12;
Hebrews 10:28-29; Romans 8:18
Other Articles
by Wayne Jackson
A Review of Recent Arguments for Women Preachers
Why Do
People Refuse to Come to Jesus?
Is Lust Fornication?
Is the Restoration Plea Valid
Are We Under Law or Grace?
Apostasy - A Clear and Ever
Present Danger
Three
Dimensions of Love
What is Truth? A Question
for the Ages
The Challenge of Agape Love
That Mysterious Disciple
The Value of the Kingdom of Heaven
Did the Early Church Observe the
Lord's Supper Daily?
- Caffin,
B.C. (1950), II Peter – Pulpit Commentary, H.D.M. Spence
and Joseph Exell, eds. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
For Past Auburn Beacons go to:
www.aubeacon.com/Bulletins.htm |
Anyone can join the mailing list for the Auburn Beacon! Send
your request to:
larryrouse@aubeacon.com |