The
New Testament speaks of the church in both the universal and the local
senses. In the universal sense, there is one body and it is composed of
all the saved of all the world
(Eph. 1:22,23; Acts 2:47).
In the local sense, a church is composed of Christians who agree to
worship and work together, and in this sense there are many churches
(Rom. 16:16).
The two
unscriptural concepts that we want to study involve how we become
members of the universal and the local church. The "language of Ashdod"
that is too prominent today indicates that many brethren do not have a
clear understanding of the distinctions between these two uses of the
word "church."
First, some
talk about "joining the church" when they are speaking about their
baptism into Christ. This indicates a lack of understanding about how we
become a part of the body of Christ. We do not "join" the universal
church. The Bible says, "And the Lord added to the church day by day
those who were being saved"
(Acts 2:47).
The one who saves us, adds us! When does He add us? The context in Acts
2 shows that those who "repented and were baptized for the remission of
their sins" were saved
(Acts 2:38,41).
Paul told the Corinthians, "For by one Spirit were we all baptized into
one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether bond or free; and were all
made to drink of one Spirit"
(1 Cor. 12:13).
The penitent believer is baptized "into one body," or "into Christ"
(Gal. 3:27)
in the sense that God forgives his sins and saves him because of his
obedience to his commands. That does not make one a member of a local
church, but of the universal church.
The second
unscriptural concept that we want to notice is the idea that baptism
automatically makes one a member of a local church. Just as we do not
join the universal church, we are not baptized into a local church.
The
Ethiopian eunuch was baptized by Philip, and "went on his way rejoicing"
because he was saved
(Acts 8:38,39),
but he was not a member of any local church at that time. Saul of Tarsus
had been baptized into Christ, and accepted by brethren in Damascus, but
when he went to Jerusalem and "assayed to join himself to the disciples"
there, he was not automatically accepted
(Acts 9:26).
After Barnabas "took him, and brought him to the apostles, and declared
unto them how he had seen the Lord in the way, and that he had spoken to
him, and how at Damascus he had preached boldly in the name of Jesus,"
they agreed to accept him (Acts
9:27).
The next verse says he "was with them"
(v. 28).
He did not just "join up," he "joined in"! But there had to be the
desire to "belong" on his part, and the willingness to "accept" on their
part. When Apollos wanted to go from Ephesus to Achaia, brethren in
Ephesus wrote a letter "to the disciples to receive him"
(Acts 18:27).
What the word of mouth accomplished for Saul, the written word
accomplished for Apollos! Before there can be local church membership,
there must be a desire to belong and an acceptance on the part of
others.
How is this
desire and agreement expressed? The Bible does not give the details
about this, therefore we must use our judgment in applying these
principles. There are three ways that I know that have been used. (1)
When a person moves to an area, or is baptized into Christ, and begins
worshiping with a congregation, his participation is accepted by the
church and understood by him as indicating desire to belong and
acceptance, and no word is spoken. (The danger of this method is that
one party or the other may misunderstand the intentions of the other.
Simply worshiping with a group does not necessarily indicate a desire to
belong, nor a willingness to accept.) (2) A person goes forward and
states his desire to the preacher, or expresses it to the elders and a
public announcement is made of this person's desire to "identify" or
join this group. Unless there is some reason to question the person's
faithfulness, he is accepted by the congregation as a member. (3) When a
person expresses a desire to be a part of the church, the elders meet
with him, or her, and discuss their mutual responsibilities. After such
discussion an announcement is made that this person is a part of the
congregation. (Elders have a special responsibility toward members of
the flock and such a meeting serves to let the prospective member know
what we are doing, as well as what we do not practice, and find out what
they have done in other places and are willing to do here. This is the
approach that the elders here use.)
Other
methods may be just as good in fulfilling the two requirements for local
church membership, but we need to keep clearly in our minds that we are
baptized "into Christ" (this is not "joining a local church"), and we
join a local church (we were not baptized into it).
Other Articles by
Frank Jamerson
A Mixed-Up World
Jesus and Hermeneutics
Phariseeism
The Apostles and Hermeneutics