Shocking
title, isn't it? I offer no apology. There comes a time when you have to
call it like you see it, and it has reached the point where you don't
have to look far to find a little girl dressed in "the attire of a
harlot"
(Prov. 7:10).
As a matter of fact, you don't have to look outside the assembling of
Christians! If this is how they dress inside, when meeting with the
saints, how are they dressing when they are going to school, playing
outside with their friends, or in any other public place?
The attire I speak of is something you might see Britney
Spears or Christina Aguilera wear in their latest scintillating video
(that is, if you watch MTV---a problem in and of itself). This
"clothing" consists of skirts that barely cover the loins, let alone the
thigh, blouses that show the midriff and barely cover the chest - all
painted on so tight you wonder if the sizing on the apparel is wrong.
Such clothing is expected if you see a prostitute on the street, but is
not expected when you see our little girls in the church - girls who are
supposedly being raised in Christian homes.
This problem is not isolated to our teenage daughters.
Immodesty in teenagers does not happen by accident. It is the result of
parents who encourage immodesty in their little girls twelve and under.
While encourage might seem like a strong word, how else do you describe
a situation where parents actually buy this immodest attire for them. It
takes purpose to instill modesty and it takes purpose to instill
immodesty. We reap what we sow.
The Bible says, "'Train up a child in the way he should
go, and when he is old he will not depart from it"
(Prov. 22:6).
If children
are taught to wear clothing that God considers nakedness in their young
and formative years, what kind of clothing, conduct and behavior will be
reaped when they are old? The natural tendency is to grow more liberal,
not more conservative. Thus, it takes a major paradigm shift to swing
from immodest to modest. However, such a paradigm shift implies a period
of many years where children were encouraged in sinful conduct - for it
is sinful to dress immodestly
(1 Pet. 3:1-7; 1 Tim. 2:8-10).
Such being the case, why are we surprised when our little
girls go the exact way we trained them to go?
If this isn't enough, rationalizations are offered for
functional uniforms that are also immodest. For example, cheerleaders
are typically required to wear very short skirts and bloomers that often
have text stamped on the backside; their routines require them to expose
themselves in a way that is anything but modest. Other sporting uniforms
are similarly rationalized (e.g., swimsuits, running shorts, dance
attire, etc.). Since their children engage in these activities, parents
argue that the immodest attire cannot be helped and should therefore be
tolerated... even accepted.
Contrary to popular belief, it can be helped and it must
not be tolerated. Such activities are optional, not mandatory. Such
activities should be discouraged, not encouraged. Were they discouraged
at a young age, they would not be desired in future ages. Our little
girls do not need to take dance class to be well-rounded Christians.
Being a popular cheerleader is "a way" that leads away from God, not
closer to God. A quick look at an NFL or NBA cheerleader provides
adequate evidence. Do you want your little daughter to grow up and dress
in such a way and engage in such activities that draw men's eyes toward
them in a lustful way
(Matt. 5:28; Luke 17:1-2)?
Immodesty in our little girls is the first step of a much larger plot,
devised by Satan, and unwittingly orchestrated by parents to so
desensitize their little girls' consciences and soften them up for a
much larger world of immorality. If Satan can get them to forget how to
blush, they are primed for a whole new genre of sin in their lives
(Jer. 6:15).
So, how does whetting your daughter's appetite for things they must turn
away from when they are older prepare them to be godly Christian women?
The wise man wrote, "It is good for a man to bear the
yoke in his youth"
(Lam. 3:27).
To set one standard when children are young, and expect an-other when
they are old, is not only contrary to the wisdom of God - it is folly!
Parents fail their children when they fail to bring them up in the
nurture and admonition of the Lord
(Eph. 6:4).
While it is true that this burden ultimately falls on fathers, reality
cannot be ignored - the church is directly impacted as well.
When parents fail to take responsibility for their
children's attire and behavior at a young age, and their children's
conduct becomes unacceptable as they grow, elders and brethren are
forced to deal with it when the children are older. Defensive (and
guilty) parents accuse preachers who preach against such immodesty of
"targeting" their children. Elders who stand strong against such
behavior are labeled by the same as "out of touch" and "binding where
God has not bound." Thus, the expectation of the parents of these
children is to compromise, lest they lose their children to the world.
Unfortunately, some of these children are already lost to the world and
it is not the church that is to blame. Nevertheless, some will blame the
church, its leadership, and those who call it like it is. The truth is
that the parents trained the child in the way she went and everyone
associated is left to bear the fruits of these labors and pray that the
grace of God will remain long enough for her to return to the Lord. An
ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Parents must train children in general (sons can dress
immodestly too!), and their daughters in particular, to appreciate
modesty and disapprove of immodesty. The church must expect modesty and
reprove, rebuke and even discipline those who teach and practice
otherwise
(2 Thess. 3:6).
Let us not dress our little girls like prostitutes, but like girls who
will grow up to profess godliness with good works.
Other Articles by
Jonathan Perz
The Doctrine of
Perfectionism
To Whose Tune Do You Hearken?
Fellowship With God is Conditional
Catechismal Christianity
"I'm Too busy for Church"