Webster
defines fickleness as
"erratic changeableness, especially in affection."
This seems to be a common proclivity of the human race. It manifests
itself with a vengeance in the church, and has from the very beginning.
Paul said to the Galatians,
(Gal
1:6)
"I
marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the
grace of Christ unto another gospel."
I think the emphasis is on the word "soon." What surprised Paul was the
"soonness" of their removal from the grace of Christ. They were fickle.
This caused Paul to say,
(Gal
4:11)
"I am
afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain,"
and
"Am I
therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?"
(Gal.
4:16). Paul was
forsaken by a previous companion, Demas.
(2
Tim. 2:10; Col. 4:14, Phil 1:24).
Paul was forsaken by everyone while on trial in Rome
(2 Tim
4:16). Jesus was
betrayed into the hands of His enemies by one of his own apostles,
Judas. David spoke of this in prophecy.
(Psa
41:9)
"Yea,
mine own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread,
hath lifted up his heel against me."
It is absolutely amazing
how soon and how quickly people can change. All preachers have
experienced alienation from brethren with whom they have had the warmest
and closest relationship in the past. It is appalling how insignificant
incidents can make bitter enemies of former close friends. It does not
matter how much good one has done in the kingdom, a simple hiccup can
make it seem as nothing. Brethren who have spoken great swelling words
about one's accomplishments, can cut you off at the knees on a moment's
notice. They will nit pick every little incident as a basis of severe
criticism. Often if they can't find something to nit pick, they will
make up something.
A sister once criticized
me for reading my Bible during a preacher's sermons (a terrible sin,
somehow I thought that is what we are supposed to do. How could I have
been so wrong?). If my critic could discern what I was doing during the
sermon, what was she doing? Watching me? Was she listening to the sermon
and watching me at the same time? Could she
watch
me and listen to the sermon,
but I can't
read
my Bible and listen to the sermon?
I will venture to say without any inclination to boast that I could tell
her more about the sermon than she could tell me about it. In most cases
I know what the preacher is going to say before he says it. All at once
this sister refused to shake hands with me, even though we had worked
together for years. It would appear from her actions that she needs to
listen to the sermons rather than watching what others do.
During the institutional
struggle, brethren often persuaded me to move to their troubled
congregations in an effort to help them. One elder told me that my
salvation might well depend upon whether I decided to move to help them
in their time of trouble. I moved there, became a symbol of everything
the liberals hated, was shamefully treated by the liberals, and once the
trouble was settled, I was cast aside as nothing by the very brother who
thought my salvation might depend upon whether I moved there. After a
period of serious illness in which I almost lost my life, I moved to a
troubled church and was able to help the brethren save it from being
overcome with error. I was told several times that God had saved my life
so I could come there to save that congregation. (I was embarrassed by
such accolades). However, the time came when I was cast aside like a
dirty shirt for the elders admitted that I had never preached error. The
problem was that the truth had stepped on the wrong toes. Whether the
preacher goes or stays often depends upon the political structure of the
congregation. In congregations with elders there is often one who runs
the show to whom the preacher must kowtow. In making a decision, an
elder once took the floor and said, "I am the oldest elder here and I
say so and so...."
In congregations without
elders there is usually a person who dominates the decision making
process. There is often a
Diotrophes type
(3 Jn.
9,10), with whom
the preacher must get along. Congregational bosses want the preacher to
be their "water boy." He is supposed to spend more time with them than
with anyone else. He is supposed to confer with them every day, maybe
have coffee with him and discuss the work of the congregation. If
something has been decided in the business meeting he doesn't like, he
wants to plot with the preacher on ways to negate it.
Congregations sometimes
are dominated by a clique. Its members usually have been there a long
time, and act like they own the church. New members are outsiders who
are tolerated, but not really included. They can worship there for years
and still be treated as outsiders. In almost 53 years of preaching the
gospel, often under difficult circumstances, I have made many friends
who have helped and encouraged me no little. On the other had I can list
some brethren who once were close friends who now consider me their
enemy for reasons unknown to me. This is the source of much pain and
consternation. I wish it were otherwise, but it isn't, and I don't know
how to fix it.
Much of what I have
discussed involves personalities and egos. Managing egos often becomes a
difficult task in local churches. There are those who want to dominate;
who want to be up front and to be seen. I knew of a brother who wanted
to lead singing. When the elders chose a brother who could do it better,
he threatened the life of the better song leader. There are others who
are offended if the preacher steps on their toes, and his name becomes
mud with them and they begin to lobby for his replacement. It is strange
that brethren can make mistakes and stay, but one mistake and the
preacher must go.
In over 50 years as a
preacher and having traveled around the world, and preached in almost
every state in the union, I have a pretty good insight into what goes on
in local churches and among preachers. I am sad to say that there are
far too many brethren, including preachers, whose dedication to the Lord
and His word is suspect. There is politics in congregations, and in the
brotherhood at large. Some see the church as an opportunity to feed
their own egos, and pursue their personal agenda. How I wish we all
would make the Lord the center of our personal and church lives. We
should assemble to worship God, and nothing else. We should humbly do
our part in conducting the public service, but not try to show off, or
be in competition with others. As the song says, it should be "all of
Thee, and none of me." However, in some cases, the Lord has to "play
second fiddle" to egocentric personalities who want to make sure that
they are duly noticed and acknowledged.
Preachers should preach
the gospel and not try to be comedians, or story tellers. Their
preaching should not be cute, entertaining, or deal with secular
matters. A brother recently told me of attending a meeting in which the
preacher spent the first 15 minutes talking about everything but the
gospel. A preacher sitting beside him pointed to his Bible and asked,
"Is he not going to use this?" Another told of attending an assembly
where the preacher told 17 stories that were supposed to be funny. Some
preachers should have been comedians, and others should have been
politicians.
Cecil Willis and I did
much work together, and became fast friends. There was often banter
between us just for fun. He jokingly said to me after a sermon,
"Needham, you could have done worse if you'd had more time." I fear this
is a true saying of some preachers I've heard, and it appears that it
gets worse as time goes on. I am afraid that some preachers don't have
good study habits and their lack of preparation shows up in their pulpit
work. A preacher who survives by ingratiating himself with the members
by flattery, is not a gospel preacher but a time server and an hireling
(1 Th
2:5). We should
have friendship that endures because of our common faith and love for
the truth.
Other Articles by
James P. Needham
Babble in Bible Classes, Pabulum in Pulpits
Exposing Error
Preserving Distinctive church Organization