Recently, Charles Colson,
a leading evangelical writer, pointed out:
Last June a Pew Forum on
Religion and Public Life survey found rampant doctrinal ignorance among
American Christians. Fifty-seven percent of evangelicals believed people
who follow religions other than their own can enjoy eternal life. The
results were so unexpected that Pew repeated the survey, asking more
specific questions. The answers were virtually unchanged. Astonishingly,
about half believed that everyone, atheists included, was going to end
up in heaven. Heaven for the godless? That’s the old heresy of
universalism (2009).
The thinking of many who
profess an identification with some form of “Christianity” has become
mushy indeed. Here is a typical comment from a student of the so-called
neo-evangelical community.
It is not now, nor was it
at the time of the reformation, the correct teaching or
doctrine which brought the reformation. It was being willing to
challenge the Church with living out the doctrine which mattered most.
Today we need a reformation of less teaching and more
living (emphasis added).
This statement is
senseless. How about more teaching and better
living? How can there be correct living without proper teaching?
If we may borrow an
expression from Solomon, “there is no new thing under the sun”
(Ecclesiastes 1:9); the same old heresies just undergo superficial
theological cosmetic surgery—or to use another metaphor, they are
recycled. Let us reflect upon several old ideas with new faces.
Universalism
Universalism asserts that
there will be the final and complete salvation of all beings. The dogma
was taught by some of the early church writers, e.g., Clement and Origen
of Alexandria, who lived in the mid-second to mid-third centuries
A.D.
There is no biblical basis for
this dogma (see
The Growing Trend Toward Universalism). Yet most folks seem
to be inclining to the notion that almost everyone—if not literally
everyone—will be saved ultimately.
Postmodernism
The expression
“postmodernism” is not found in Van Harvey’s book, A Handbook of
Theological Terms, published in 1968. It is a relatively new
designation. Postmodernism denies universal truth. Supposedly, truth is
how each individual feels about things, not how they really are. Hence,
supposedly there is no exclusive, true gospel. The
facts of Christianity must be redefined by a new vocabulary in
preaching, writing, and worship. This is a wrong-headed ideology.
The Emerging Church
The so-called “emerging
church” is the stepchild of postmodernism. This ideology contends it is
arrogant to believe that one knows the truth; instead the “truth” is
that truth is only determined subjectively, being fashioned by culture,
not Scripture. Is this concept even remotely associated with a logical
thought process?
It is contended that each
person must find his own way to God, and not be addicted to
“bibliolatry.” This sounds like the philosophy of those rebels who lived
in the dark ages of Israel’s history (Judges 21:25). The “emergist”
believes all are arrogant who do not subscribe to his elastic view of
truth. He absolutely knows one cannot know
absolute truth.
Several of these aberrant
ideas have found their way into churches that once were conservative.
For example, it is argued by an increasing number that we cannot declare
as gospel truth that those are wrong who disagree with our “traditional”
teaching. All teaching is now declared to be mere tradition.
What difference does it
make whether one believes that baptism is “*for* [unto, to obtain] the
remission of sins,” or whether it is “*because of* remission of sins.”
It is alleged that gospel preachers of bygone years who debated with the
sectarians on the design of baptism were misguided. Some are contending
that the mode of baptism is irrelevant; sprinkling is as valid as
immersion, and those baptized as infants must not be excluded from
Christian fellowship. To speak of a "non-immersion baptism” is an
oxymoron, because “baptize” by definition signifies “to immerse.”
“Emerging” churches are
restructuring the worship format. The Lord’s supper is being offered in
conjunction with special events, e.g., weddings. The communion memorial
is not restricted to the Lord’s day; instead groups step beyond the
biblical pattern and provide it on weekdays, ignoring a New Testament
that is undergirded with historical truth, namely the Lord’s
resurrection on Sunday.
The music issue is wide
open among a growing number of churches. A prominent church in Dallas
(that once hosted a respected school of preaching) recently advertised
for a “minister of music.” One of the stipulations was that he must be
able to play the guitar or the electronic keyboard. Choirs, praise
teams, clapping to accompany singing, etc., are becoming standard fare
in a number of churches. Performance is rapidly supplementing
congregational worship. Biblical authority yields to emotionalism. It is
the new “will-worship” (Colossians 2:23).
These are trying times
for the body of Christ. But it is not a time for despair. Instead,
courageous men and women must keep the ship of Zion on a straight (and
strait) course within the boundaries of divine truth. Truth will prevail
in spite of the winds of change—and irrelevant statistics.
Other Articles by Wayne Jackson
The New Testament Pattern of Giving
Are The Gospels Part of the New Testament
The New Hermeneutic - An Abandonment of Reason