Splendid Discontent
by James W. Adams
If
there is one peccadillo that characterizes this generation it is the mania
for change. Change for the sake of change is thought to be a mark of
liberation from "tradition" and of intellectual sophistication. Ella Wheeler
Wilcox, though not necessarily advocating change for the sake of change,
paid tribute to the desire for change when she wrote,
"The splendid discontent of God with chaos made the world; and from the
discontent of man, the world's best progress springs."
However, she failed to note that
not
all of man's discontent is "splendid."
A more practical and
perceptive statement statesman, inventor and author said, "All
human inventions have their inconveniencies. We feel those of the present,
but see nor fear those of the future, and hence we often make troublesome
changes without amendment and frequently for the worse"
(Benjamin Franklin). It can be and often is "from bad to worse." Someone has
likened this to a "farmer burning down his barn to get rid of the rats."
While change is the law
of growth, it is not always benign. Not all growth is healthy nor
progressive. One can blow up a balloon to several times its normal size, but
balloons often burst under pressure to which they are thus subjected. The
result is destructive, not constructive.
Our generation has seen
more changes than another in human history, but the
"discontent"
that has produced them has not always been
"splendid,"
hence many of the changes have been malignant rather than benign. This is
not only true in the secular realm, but professed churches of Christ have
likewise undergone radical changes that have not always been benign and
constructive but malignant and destructive.
Advocates of changes,
the discontented, in congregations have the obligation to give an adequate
reason why changes should be made. Of first consideration would be whether
or not the current situation meets the demands of Scripture. If not, change
is not only advisable but essential. Second in importance is whether the
proposed changes would bring the situation into harmony with Scripture.
The question of
Scripture having been settled, the proposed changes should meet the demands
of expediency. Are they viable? Are they more effective in accomplishing the
objectives of a congregation's work and worship? Are they spiritually
motivated, or merely an effort to accommodate the pressures of modern
subjectivism, emotionalism, and anarchism in religion? Do they constitute an
abdication to the
devotees to novelty,
or will they actually promote edification and soul-saving influence upon the
believer and the unbeliever.
No Christian should
cling to the old simply because it is old. Neither should the new be desired
because it is new.
Many things are old because they have been tried, proven, and not found
wanting. Things
are not right because they are old, but often are old because they are
right. On the other hand, things are not wrong because they are new and
different.
The old and the new
should both meet the demands of
Scripture and expediency,
and the decision to change or not to change made on this basis. If
"discontent"
issue in benevolent change, it is indeed
"splendid" If it
merely bows to the spirit of novelty, it is neither benign nor progressive,
only
"worldly." The
philosophy of the poet, Wilcox tempered by that of statesman, Franklin,
would seem to be safe course in religious matters as well as secular.
The point of this
article is well illustrated by three classes of persons noted in the
Scriptures. The
scribes and Pharisees
were opponents of change by reason of their devotion to their purely human
traditions. Jesus rebuked their attitude by saying, "No man having drunk old
wine straightway desireth new: for he saith: The old is better"
(Luke 5:39). On
the other hand,
the
philosophers of Athens
"spent their time in
nothing else, but to tell, or hear some new thing"
(Acts 17:21).
The right attitude is exemplified by Cornelius, the Gentile Centurion, who
said, "Now therefore are we all present before God, to hear all things that
are commanded thee of God"
(Acts 10:34).
Other Articles by James W. Adams
Rascals
are Always Sociable