While
reading the report on the 152nd Semi-annual General Conference of the
church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day-Saints (Mormons), held on October
2-3, 1982, I began to see some very interesting comparisons.
During
the 39 talks given, the Bible was quoted 164 times while the Mormon
Doctrine was quoted 128 times, this included three quotations from the
Gospel of John (Joseph Smith's Inspired Translation).
The
Bible was quoted three times more often than the Book of Mormon,
although only 15 books of the New Testament, 14 books of the Old
Testament, and 8 books from the Book of Mormon were used.
The
most quoted book, of Mormon doctrine was the Doctrine and Covenants
quoted 64 times, the least being the book of Abraham once.
The
most quoted book of the New Testament was the book of Matthew quoted 34
times also the book of Luke 31 times, the least quoted books were
Philippians, Titus, and Revelation.
The
most quoted book of the Old Testament was the book of Joshua 12 times
and the book of Genesis 7 times. The least quoted was the book of Joel
once.
I find
their use of the Bible most interesting when considering what Apostle
Orson Pratt a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles had to say in
the 1850's concerning the Bible and the book of Matthew:
Many
Protestants say they take the Bible as their only rule of faith . . . .
What evidence have they that the book of Matthew was inspired of God, or
any other of the books of the New Testament? The only evidence they have
is tradition .... Can we rely upon it in it's present known corrupted
state, as being a faithful record of God's word?. . . What few
(manuscripts that, R.R.) have come down to our day have been mutilated,
changed and corrupted . . . . Verses and even whole chapters have been
added by unknown persons; and we are not certain that all those which we
do know were written by inspiration . . . . Who in his right mind, could
for a moment, suppose the Bible in its present form to be a perfect
guide? Who knows that even one verse of the whole Bible has escaped
pollution, so as to convey the same sense now that it did in the
original? (Orson Pratt's Works, The Bible Alone An Insufficient Guide,
pp. 44-47).
The
Apostle Mark E. Peterson one of the speakers at the conference and also
a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles had this to say about the
reliability of the Bible:
Many
insertions were made, some of them `slanted' for selfish purposes, while
at times deliberate falsifications and Fabrications were perpetrated"
(As Translated Correctly, p. 4). It is evident then that many of the
`plain and precious' things were omitted from the Bible by failure to
choose all of the authentic books for inclusion, and by deliberate
changes deletions and forgeries. . . (p. 14, all italics mine R.R.).
After
making such a statement he quotes from the books of Matthew and Luke 11
times during his talk. Is he now saying that it is alright to use some
of the books of the Bible?
If the
Bible is so corrupt why do they persist in quoting from it? Having been
a Mormon for eighteen years, I think I can truthfully say that the
Mormon church will use any Bible Scripture that will help them when they
find it convenient to use it.
I would
like to ask any of my Mormon friends who might read this to open their
Bible to 2 Peter 1:3.
After reading this Scripture do what the Mormons asked you to do when
you joined them, Ask God to open your heart so that you can honestly and
earnestly examine the true teaching found in the New Testament, so that
you can become a part of the true body of Jesus Christ.
In
closing I would like to say I hope that we can successfully teach our
friends and neighbors the falseness of Mormonism, before that day
described in Mt.
7:21-23, When the Lord will say, "I never knew you depart from
me, ye that work iniquity."
Guardian of Truth—May 5, 1983
Other Articles
Answering a Muslim Critic
Loving What is Right
A Salvation Issue
Would you like
others to read this article?
Please share!