The title
for this editorial is taken verbatim from the restrictive clause in the
deed to the new property of a congregation in Henderson, Texas. The
Church of Christ
in that town has had a most interesting history. Some twenty years ago
(December 12, 1939, to be exact) Brother John W. Akin deeded a piece of
property to the church there, and safe-guarded it for the faithful
brethren by inserting the usual restrictive clause in the deed, to wit:
"As a part
of the consideration for the transfer of said described property to said
Trustees it is understood and agreed that no innovations, such as
mechanical instruments of music in the worship, Church shows, festivals,
suppers, or human societies, such as are not authorized by the New
Testament . . . shall be tolerated in the church building to be erected
on said property, etc"
The church
in Henderson grew and prospered. The old building became out-dated and
inadequate. Some months ago another plot of land was secured, and a new
and more modern meeting-house was erected. But when it came time to
write the "restrictive clause" for the new property, a real problem
arose. For the Henderson congregation had come under the blighting
influence of the "social gospel" craze now sweeping through so many
congregations; and their leaders were intelligent enough to realize that
the restrictive clause under which they held the original property was
far, far too "restrictive" to permit of the ambitious plans and schemes
and promotions which they were now engaged in, and which they planned
for the future.
Yet, if
they held the property with NO restrictive clause at all, this would be
too clear and obvious a step toward modernism, and might cause several
of the older and more conservative members to leave them and begin
worshipping with the conservative group in Henderson. So they worked out
this new (and highly revealing!) "restrictive clause":
"And as a
part of the consideration for the transfer of said described property,
and as a material inducement for the transfer of said property, it is
understood and agreed that no innovation such as the use of mechanical
instruments of music of any type or form in any kind of worship service
by the Church; church shows, festivals, suppers, or human societies,
such as are not authorized by a well defined and clear-shown majority of
the Churches of Christ in Texas, shall be tolerated in the church
building to be erected on said property, etc."
Thus you
have the contrast! The original property was to be used only for those
things "authorized by the New Testament"; while the new property is to
be used for anything authorized by a well defined and clear-shown
majority of the Churches of Christ in Texas"!
The
Henderson brethren have been honest enough and frank enough to
acknowledge, at least by implication, that they are no longer going to
be "restricted" to that which the New Testament authorizes; but will
feel free to practice anything which is "authorized by a well defined
and clear-shown majority of the Churches of Christ in Texas."
There was
a time within the memory of thousands of Texans now living when a "well
defined and clear-shown majority of the Churches of Christ in Texas"
used instrumental music in their worship, supported the Texas Christian
Missionary Society, endorsed and supported women preachers, raised money
by pie suppers and church socials, called all their preachers
"Reverend", and participated fully and enthusiastically in all the
"innovations" of digressionism. In fact, that "majority" at the turn of
the century was about four to one — for every faithful congregation in
Texas there were four digressive "Churches of Christ." Where would the
Henderson church have been had her present attitude prevailed at that
time? Obviously, she would have gone with "the majority". For it is
clearly the conviction of her leaders that the "majority" of Texas
churches are to be accepted as the standard of what is, and what is not,
pleasing and acceptable in the sight of God.
The
Henderson brethren also are wise enough to realize that the present
little flurry over orphan homes and Herald of Truth are the beginning
rather than the end of popular promotions. And they are putting
themselves on record early in the game as being anxious to go "with the
majority" — right or wrong, scriptural or unscriptural, true or false!
Well, as they have it now, they will never have any difficulty over
their property just as long as they can determine what "the majority"
are doing. Church contributions to colleges will be next in order. Let
nobody think for one moment that the liberal brethren have abandoned
their plans for such an arrangement. Already they are making their
defenses of it, saying only that it is inexpedient "for the present
time". Then will come church supported hospitals; medical schools;
social agencies; and all the vast accumulation of clubs, organizations,
institutions and human promotions which have always developed in human
churches, and which are so clearly illustrated in the conglomerate chaos
of Roman Catholicism. Indeed, Romanism itself developed from the very
attitude of abandoning "New Testament authority" for "authority of the
majority".
We quote
the words of a well-known gospel preacher of a past generation: "Don't
forget, brethren, we are drifting!" – Gospel Guardian,
July 23, 1959
Other Articles by F. Yater Tant
Going Home