``And 
		John answered and said, `Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy 
		name; and we forbade him, because he followeth not with us'''
		(Lu. 9:49).
		
		Answered what? The word may mean, ``began to speak'' but Vine says 
		always ``where something has preceded, either statement or act to which 
		the remarks  refer.'' The Harper-Bagster Lexicon says, ``in N.T.  to 
		respond to certain present circumstances.'' What ``brought on'' John's 
		remarks about the man he had ``forbidden''?
		The 
		preceding verses show that the Disciples had been disputing about who 
		among them should be greatest, and Jesus had rebuked them for their 
		pride (See Mk. 
		9:33-37). John is not named specifically, but other passages say 
		James and John accompanied their mother when she asked Jesus to seat 
		them in high positions in His kingdom
		(Matt. 20:20-f). 
		Was the woman alone in her desire for greatness? I believe the 
		sons must share the blame and that John (perhaps James, also) was enough 
		involved in the arguments about greatness that Jesus' rebuke carried a 
		special ``sting.''
		Is it 
		not a well established trait of human nature that when the sermon fits, 
		we try to change the subject? Our personal defense is to launch our own 
		attack upon someone else. If, in this new battle, we can make our former 
		critic an ally, perhaps he will forget all about the fault he saw in us. 
		The shoe fits--so we try to find a different shoe, for someone else.
		When 
		John felt the sting of the Lord's rebuke to pride, he ``answered'' by 
		saying, in effect, ``Master, we (James also?) saw this `outsider' doing 
		wrongly, and we really jumped on him. We let him have it!!''
		Even if 
		John's judgment was right and his actions respecting the second man 
		justified, this would not remove John's fault. How embarrassing to 
		discover he was again wrong. Jesus said, ``Forbid him not....''
		Will we 
		never learn--a second error does not correct the first--we cannot grow 
		by causing others to appear smaller--and, final judgment is on an 
		individual basis, by One who sees and knows our very thoughts. 
		
		Other Articles by Robert Turner
		
		
		A Bit of Methodist History on 
		Instrumental Music
		Careful to 
		Answer
		A Man Called 
		David
		 
		
		
		
		
 Would you like 
		others to read this article? 
		          
		       
		 Please share!