On the question of
the necessity of authority for religious practices there are but two
positions that one can take. Either we must have authority or we do not
have to have authority for all that we do in religion. Any position in
between would be ridiculous and impossible. If someone should insist
that one must have authority for some things, but not for all things, by
what standard could he possibly distinguish the things for which he must
have authority from the things for which he does not need authority?
And how could he condemn anything merely because it was unauthorized in
the Scriptures?
May God pity the man
who calls himself a gospel preacher and who makes such statements as:
"Why we do many things for which we do not have authority"; and "We do
not have to have authority for everything we do in religion." Such a
preacher would have neither right nor grounds to condemn any of the
religious practices around us, which, though without authority, are not
expressly forbidden in the Scriptures. On what basis would he show that
instrumental music, infant baptism, choirs, missionary societies,
quarterly or annual communion, etc., are wrong?
Authority falls
into two categories: general and specific. Some things are specifically
authorized: baptism, singing, Lord's Supper. Other things are
authorized because they are embraced in and necessary to the performance
of things specifically authorized: (Some things may be used as "aids" in
carrying out a command as long as no Scriptural principle is violated);
a baptistry, songbooks, containers.
To say that one must
have authority for all that he does in religion is a far cry from saying
that one must have specific authority for all that he does in religion.
Some "gospel preachers" have offered this sort of quibble: "Why if one
must have authority for everything, where did Noah get the authority for
the tools he used in building the ark since God did not specify any
tools." This is nothing more than a dodge, a smoke screen to cover up
the fact that many churches today are practicing things for which they
have no authority--either general or specific. Certainly Noah had
authority in that tools were necessary to carry out the injunction to
build the ark. Had God specified the tools, he would have been limited
to what God specified.
Other Articles
The church for Everyone
The
Pharisee Shield
How to Raise a Heartache
Would you like
others to read this article?
Please share!