It's
really ironic: members in the church of Christ are often accused of not
believing in the blood of Jesus, while those who make this accusation
might observe the Lord's supper only one to four times a year.
As
Christians, we realize the need to remember that precious blood by which
the atonement was made. Without the Lord's life-saving sacrifice, sinful
man would remain in a lost and hopeless condition, heading inevitably to
an eternal separation from God Himself.
But now
through Jesus Christ and by our faith and obedience, we can contact the
blood of the Lord and enjoy the benefits of having our sins washed away
and the beginning of a new life in the Christ. Actually, the church
itself is the ``saved''; and the ``saved'' are simply those who have
been ``bought by the blood'' of the Savior.
This
lesson has been designed to show that the Christian should take of the
Lord's supper every first day of the week in order to remember the death
of Jesus and be pleasing to God.
Acts 20:7 is
the only passage that specifies the first day of the week as being the
day in which early Christians met to partake of the communion, but this
one passage is enough to suffice.
Let us
again consider the comments of a few highly regarded men who represent
different denominational backgrounds, as to their remarks on
Acts 20:7 and
the early church's weekly observance of the Lord's supper. This will
clearly establish that the weekly participation in the Lord's supper is
not just an ``unusual doctrine'' only accepted by those in the ``church
of Christ.'' (Let us also remember, however, that the quotes of men are
never to be the basis for our beliefs in religious matters; but only
that which is from God Himself.)
Adam
Clarke: ''...the Lord's day...in which they commemorated the
resurrection of our Lord...'to break bread'...intimating, by this, that
they were accustomed to receive the holy sacrament on each Lord's
day...''
Albert
Barnes: ```to break bread.' Evidently to celebrate the Lord's supper. It
is probably that the apostles and early Christians celebrated the Lord's
supper on every Lord's day.''
Pulpit
Commentary: ```to break bread.' This is also an important example of
weekly communion as the practice of the first Christians...it is
impossible not to conclude that the breaking of bread in the celebration
of the Lord's Supper is an essential part of the holy sacrament, which
man may not for any specious reasons omit....''
Matthew
Henry: ``They `came together to break bread,' that is, to celebrate the
ordinance of the Lord's supper, that one instituted sign of breaking the
bread being put for all the rest...In the primitive times it was the
custom of many churches to receive the Lord's supper every Lord's
day....''
What
does the Bible say? In
Acts 2:42,
mention is made that the early Christians ``continued steadfastly''
(``were continually devoting themselves,'' NAS) in the Lord's Supper. If
I told you that I continued steadfastly in doing my dishes; but, in
actuality, I washed them only four times a year; you probably would not
consider this being ``steadfast.''
1 Corinthians
11:20-22,33, 34 also indicates the frequent observance of the
Lord's supper. It reads: ``Therefore when you meet together, it is not
to eat the Lord's Supper, for in your eating each one takes his own
supper first; and one is hungry and another is drunk. What! Do you not
have houses in which to eat and drink? Or do you despise the church of
God, and shame those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I
praise you? In this I will not praise you...So then, my brethren, when
you come together to eat, wait for one another. If anyone is hungry,
let him eat at home, so that you may not come together for
judgment....'' The inference is that when they met it was to take of the
Lord's supper, which shows it was to be observed quite often; but,
unfortunately, they had profaned it by turning it into a common meal --
for this, Paul reprimands them.
In
realizing the seriousness of this observance
(1 Cor 11:27-30),
how could one assume that God would allow His children to become
lackadaisical with it? to overlook it? or simply minimize it by
partaking of it so seldom?
Notice
where the emphasis is placed in
Acts 20:7:
``And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together
to break bread, Paul preached unto them....'' Commenting on this,
Coffman declares: ``This emphatically states the purpose of Christian
assemblies on Sundays throughout history, that purpose being for the
observance of the Lord's supper...Even the address of so distinguished
an apostle as Paul took second billing on that occasion, the primary
purpose having been to observe the Lord's supper...The Christians, from
earliest times, had the habit of meeting for the Lord's supper on `a
fixed day,' and Acts
20:7 identifies that day as `the first day of the week,'
Sunday.''
Sunday
is a ``special'' day to the Christian. Though it is true that every day
is a day in which one should serve God, Sunday has its special forms of
worship. Not only the communion, but also the contribution is to be
observed on this day.
1 Corinthians 16:2
reads, ``Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay
by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings
when I come.'' Seldom will one hear any preacher object to the weekly
offering of the saints. Actually, many denominations today practice more
collections than the Bible authorizes; but without the death of Christ
there could not even be any offering from the ``saints.''
The
communion is a memorial of Jesus Christ; which has not only been
instituted by Him, but also made possible by His very death. As the Lord
was quoted concerning this supper in
1 Cor. 11:18,
''...do this in remembrance of Me.''
Early
Christians shared the Lord's Supper every Lord's day. May it be our
desire to emulate them in that which we believe and practice. Though
some things have ceased, the observance of the Lord's Supper has not;
and it is to continue until Jesus Christ returns
(1 Cor. 11:26).
Other Articles
All The Way or Not At All
Is Love to Blame?