"I
charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will
judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: Preach
the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke,
exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. For the time will come when
they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires,
because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves
teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be
turned aside to fables."-- 2 Timothy 4:1-4.
A local
church is going to be about as strong and sound as the preaching it
receives and is willing to endure and support. Paul's solemn charge to
Timothy had a sense of urgency about it. Preach the word now, while
brethren will endure it, or face a time when they will not.
For
several years this writer has been paying particular attention as
seasoned brethren (preachers and otherwise) express their concerns about
the churches of today. The one dominant concern seems to be the caliber
of preaching coming from our pulpits of late. As one old soldier of the
cross expressed it to me, "I am getting tired of going to gospel
meetings and hearing `fluff'." He went on to explain what he meant by
"fluff." Preaching that contained very little real Bible teaching.
Brethren, strong congregations cannot be built and maintained on
"fluff." Did you ever buy cotton candy? Then you know what "fluff" is. I
remember, as a youngster, that I would spend my dime on a huge stick of
it at the county fair. It was spun and displayed so as to make me think
that I was getting a lot more for my money than I was. I soon learned
that I had bought mostly fluff--very little candy inflated with a lot of
air.
The sad
thing about it all is that many churches had rather have "fluff" than
real spiritual food. As long a churches demand it, there will be those
who are willing to be paid to spin it out for them.
Sermons
and classes with real doctrinal content are held in disfavor by many of
today's churches. The demand is for more "relevant"(?) matters. Themes
more suited for psychologists and sociologists are replacing basic Bible
topics. Topics that address so-called "real problems" and "real life
concerns" of "today's Christian" are replacing those that deal with what
the Book says about man's basic spiritual problem, sin; and his real
basic needs--conviction of sin and the salvation of his soul. Lectures
aimed more at enhancing man's present happiness and welfare than
ensuring his eternal well-being are by far the most widely received.
Preachers that entertain and make brethren feel good about themselves,
rather than producing godly sorrow leading to repentance or any real
depth of scriptural knowledge, are given the most favored status among
brethren. Sermons that really teach the Bible are considered,
"uninteresting", "too-structured" and even "crude" by some. All too
often preachers who resort to such are asked to find some place else to
do their preaching. We have observed a rash of this lately.
Subjects more suitable for a civic club seminar than for a gospel
meeting are commonly announced. Sunday after Sunday, if what I hear is
accurate, talks that would be welcomed in any denominational church in
town are passed off as gospel sermons. Unfortunately, as the title of
the old country song put it, "What Lola Wants Lola Gets?"
So, all
too often, preachers and elders bow to the pressure of those who want
this "fluff." We know a good preacher, who is capable of making Bible
studies interesting, who began a study of Isaiah (with its emphasis on
the Messianic prophecies) for a college-age class. There was so much
opposition to it by some members of the class that the elders saw fit to
set up an alternate class--so that those who wanted to could study
something more "interesting" and "relevant." As my daddy used to say,
"Now isn't that a pretty come off?"
A
congregation constantly fed on "fluff" will not develop an appetite for
sound doctrine. Any who may have had an appetite will soon loose it.
Without a desire for sound doctrine churches are vulnerable to all kinds
of fables.
Neither
motivational hype nor emotional manipulation is gospel preaching. Such
may produce increased activity of a sort. It may even build and inspire
audiences after a fashion. It may enhance the speaker's standing with
brethren as a dynamic speaker. But, it will not produce a well-grounded
faith based upon a "thus saith the Lord."
Brethren, our preaching must follow the pattern that Paul outlined to
Timothy. In form, it must have a well-rounded combination of
convincing (reproving--KJV), rebuking and exhorting (or encouraging). In
substance, it must have teaching (doctrine) at the base. It is no
accident that Paul, in the preceding chapter, shows the Scriptures to be
profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in
righteousness (2 Tim.
3:16).
Book,
chapter, and verse preaching/teaching that quotes or reads scriptures
and then makes clear applications of the reading seldom sweeps folks
along on clouds of ecstasy. Nor does it flow quite as smoothly as Dale
Carnegie trained orations. Nor is it likely to make folks jump up and
down with uncontrollable joy nor roll in the aisles with laughter. It
will likely cause them to mostly sit and ponder on the validity of the
message--comparing it with the Scriptures before them. Once convicted of
the validity of the message, they will then be motivated to act with
both an intelligent and emotional response to the great message
preached. They are then moved by the power of the gospel preached more
than the charismatic personal power of the preacher/teacher or dynamic
qualities of his delivery.
We need
preachers who will preach it just like Paul and other inspired men wrote
it. Preachers who will preach the word in season and out, without regard
to whether churches will endure and support it.
We need
churches who not only endure sound doctrine, but demand it
of those they support in local work, in gospel meetings and throughout
the world. Unless we have this we will continue seeing churches slide
toward religious error and philosophical foolishness and away from the
sound doctrine based on "what saith the Scriptures."
Other Articles
Needful Preaching
Legalism - The Un-Sin
Why Does God Allow Evil?
Would you like
others to read this article?
Please share!