"I 
		charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will 
		judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: Preach 
		the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, 
		exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. For the time will come when 
		they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, 
		because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves 
		teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be 
		turned aside to fables."-- 2 Timothy 4:1-4.
		A local 
		church is going to be about as strong and sound as the preaching it 
		receives and is willing to endure and support. Paul's solemn charge to 
		Timothy had a sense of urgency about it. Preach the word now, while 
		brethren will endure it, or face a time when they will not.
		For 
		several years this writer has been paying particular attention as 
		seasoned brethren (preachers and otherwise) express their concerns about 
		the churches of today. The one dominant concern seems to be the caliber 
		of preaching coming from our pulpits of late. As one old soldier of the 
		cross expressed it to me, "I am getting tired of going to gospel 
		meetings and hearing `fluff'." He went on to explain what he meant by 
		"fluff." Preaching that contained very little real Bible teaching.
		
		Brethren, strong congregations cannot be built and maintained on 
		"fluff." Did you ever buy cotton candy? Then you know what "fluff" is. I 
		remember, as a youngster, that I would spend my dime on a huge stick of 
		it at the county fair. It was spun and displayed so as to make me think 
		that I was getting a lot more for my money than I was. I soon learned 
		that I had bought mostly fluff--very little candy inflated with a lot of 
		air.
		The sad 
		thing about it all is that many churches had rather have "fluff" than 
		real spiritual food. As long a churches demand it, there will be those 
		who are willing to be paid to spin it out for them.
		Sermons 
		and classes with real doctrinal content are held in disfavor by many of 
		today's churches. The demand is for more "relevant"(?) matters. Themes 
		more suited for psychologists and sociologists are replacing basic Bible 
		topics. Topics that address so-called "real problems" and "real life 
		concerns" of "today's Christian" are replacing those that deal with what 
		the Book says about man's basic spiritual problem, sin; and his real 
		basic needs--conviction of sin and the salvation of his soul. Lectures 
		aimed more at enhancing man's present happiness and welfare than 
		ensuring his eternal well-being are by far the most widely received. 
		Preachers that entertain and make brethren feel good about themselves, 
		rather than producing godly sorrow leading to repentance or any real 
		depth of scriptural knowledge, are given the most favored status among 
		brethren. Sermons that really teach the Bible are considered, 
		"uninteresting", "too-structured" and even "crude" by some. All too 
		often preachers who resort to such are asked to find some place else to 
		do their preaching. We have observed a rash of this lately.
		
		Subjects more suitable for a civic club seminar than for a gospel 
		meeting are commonly announced. Sunday after Sunday, if what I hear is 
		accurate, talks that would be welcomed in any denominational church in 
		town are passed off as gospel sermons. Unfortunately, as the title of 
		the old country song put it, "What Lola Wants Lola Gets?"
		So, all 
		too often, preachers and elders bow to the pressure of those who want 
		this "fluff." We know a good preacher, who is capable of making Bible 
		studies interesting, who began a study of Isaiah (with its emphasis on 
		the Messianic prophecies) for a college-age class. There was so much 
		opposition to it by some members of the class that the elders saw fit to 
		set up an alternate class--so that those who wanted to could study 
		something more "interesting" and "relevant." As my daddy used to say, 
		"Now isn't that a pretty come off?"
		A 
		congregation constantly fed on "fluff" will not develop an appetite for 
		sound doctrine. Any who may have had an appetite will soon loose it. 
		Without a desire for sound doctrine churches are vulnerable to all kinds 
		of fables.
		Neither 
		motivational hype nor emotional manipulation is gospel preaching. Such 
		may produce increased activity of a sort. It may even build and inspire 
		audiences after a fashion. It may enhance the speaker's standing with 
		brethren as a dynamic speaker. But, it will not produce a well-grounded 
		faith based upon a "thus saith the Lord."
		
		Brethren, our preaching must follow the pattern that Paul outlined to 
		Timothy. In form, it must have a well-rounded combination of 
		convincing (reproving--KJV), rebuking and exhorting (or encouraging). In
		substance, it must have teaching (doctrine) at the base. It is no 
		accident that Paul, in the preceding chapter, shows the Scriptures to be 
		profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in 
		righteousness (2 Tim. 
		3:16).
		Book, 
		chapter, and verse preaching/teaching that quotes or reads scriptures 
		and then makes clear applications of the reading seldom sweeps folks 
		along on clouds of ecstasy. Nor does it flow quite as smoothly as Dale 
		Carnegie trained orations. Nor is it likely to make folks jump up and 
		down with uncontrollable joy nor roll in the aisles with laughter. It 
		will likely cause them to mostly sit and ponder on the validity of the 
		message--comparing it with the Scriptures before them. Once convicted of 
		the validity of the message, they will then be motivated to act with 
		both an intelligent and emotional response to the great message 
		preached. They are then moved by the power of the gospel preached more 
		than the charismatic personal power of the preacher/teacher or dynamic 
		qualities of his delivery.
		We need 
		preachers who will preach it just like Paul and other inspired men wrote 
		it. Preachers who will preach the word in season and out, without regard 
		to whether churches will endure and support it.
		We need 
		churches who not only endure sound doctrine, but demand it 
		of those they support in local work, in gospel meetings and throughout 
		the world. Unless we have this we will continue seeing churches slide 
		toward religious error and philosophical foolishness and away from the 
		sound doctrine based on "what saith the Scriptures."
		
		Other Articles 
		
		Needful Preaching
		
		Legalism - The Un-Sin
		
		Why Does God Allow Evil?
		 
		
		
		
		
 Would you like 
		others to read this article? 
		          
		       
		 Please share!