Pattern
theology is the belief that God has given mankind patterns in the Bible
and expects, yea, demands that we follow them. This has been the
traditional view of the Scriptures in the church since the restoration.
There are some in the church today that are questioning this approach to
Scripture. In fact, some have come right out and denied it. The
following quote is from a speech delivered by brother Rubel Shelly at
the Missouri Street Church of Christ in West Memphis, Arkansas, on April
20-21, 1990.
“Are we
really looking for a pattern? We have taken Acts and tried to make it a
prison. Acts was not meant to be a pattern. I reject pattern theology.
The Scripture is not a book of case law to be cited like a bunch of
proof texts. The way to teach people about the Bible is not to quote a
series of steps to salvation. I am not looking for a pattern. I am
looking for a Person.”
If
brother Shelly is right, then why did God give us two detailed
descriptions of the qualifications for elders if they are not a pattern
to follow? Why did God give instructions about the specific emblems to
be used in the communion and what they were to represent if they are not
a pattern to follow?
If
brother Shelly is right, then what about Jesus and John's teaching about
the necessity of doing God's will. "Not every one that saith unto me,
Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth
the will of my Father which is in heaven"
(Matt. 7:21).
"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the
will of God abideth for ever"
(I John 2:17).
If
doing God's will does not mean doing what God has determined should be
done and how God has determined it should be done, then what does it
mean?
If
brother Shelly is right, then let's sprinkle babies! To restrict baptism
to repentant believers and to insist that it must be full body immersion
is to insist that the Bible contains a pattern for candidates and a
pattern for the method which must be followed.
A
rejection of the concept of binding patterns is a rejection of the plain
teaching of Romans
6:17 "But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but
ye have obeyed
from the heart that
form of doctrine
which was delivered [them]" (emphasis added). The Roman brethren
were no longer "servants of sin" because they had "obeyed from the heart
that form of doctrine which was delivered." Notice they didn't simply
believe, nor did they simply obey, but they obeyed the very "form of
doctrine which was delivered." The Simple English Bible translation is
quite clear as to what Paul meant. It reads "pattern of teaching." If
Romans 6:17
isn't an endorsement of pattern theology, then what is it?
Brother
Shelly asserted that he wasn't "looking for a pattern," but that he was
"looking for a Person." The person we should be looking for is Jesus and
Jesus said we must obey God's will. By telling us that we must obey
God's will, Jesus is telling us that there is a pattern. We find Christ
when we follow the pattern. Jesus said, "He that hath my commandments,
and keepeth them [pattern theology], he it is that loveth me: and he
that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and
will manifest myself to him"
(John 14:21).
And "if a man love me, he will keep my words [pattern theology]: and my
Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with
him" (John 14:23).
No man can find Jesus unless Jesus is willing to "manifest" himself to
him. No man can find Jesus unless Jesus comes to him. Brother Shelly and
others can look for Jesus all they want, but without him coming to them
and manifesting himself to them, their search will be in vain.
The
person we should be looking for is Jesus and the Bible says that Jesus
is the "author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him"
(Heb. 5:9).
Where there is no direction, instruction, pattern (call it what you
will), there can be no obedience. If there is no obedience, then there
is no salvation. Simply put, no pattern means nothing to obey. Nothing
to obey means no obedience. No obedience means no salvation! If that is
the case, then why bother to look for Jesus? No pattern theology does
more than reject the concept of patterns, it is effectively also a
rejection of salvation.
Other Articles
Why No Instruments of Music?
A Word or Two on Behalf of Simplicity
Losing
Individualism
Would you like
others to read this article?
Please share!