Let me
first of all say that in matters of the faith -- such as in God's plan
of salvation, the elements to be used for the Lord's Supper, or the
proper view toward stealing, for examples -- there is no room for
compromise; but in some matters of indifference, one must be willing and
able to compromise at times.
I read
a little illustration recently about two children who had been in a
squabble. The mother, trying to put an end to their commotion, said,
``Hush! You two children are always quarreling. Why can't you agree once
in a while?'' In response, her wrangling son explained, ``We do agree,
Mama. Joan wants the largest piece of cake and so do I.''
Undoubtedly, Joan and her brother were in need of learning a lesson
about compromise -- to have the willingness to give in to the other's
wishes.
I've
often heard people say to others, ``You always must have your own way.''
When the real irony to this is that those who say such are usually
totally unaware of all the times in which that person had respectfully
bowed to the whims, plans, or desires of others. I would imagine this
often happens in the marriage relationship --but how often is it
overlooked?
We must
realize that it isn't the nature of a true Christian to always be
``demanding one's rights'' or to be inflexible in all matters of
indifference. Jesus taught this principle when He said, ``And whoever
shall force you to go one mile, go with him
two'' (Matt. 5:41).
As we come to understand the background for this statement, we are made
aware that the Romans, of whom the Jews were then in subjugation (and
often with loathing and great reluctance), had the right, by law, to
command a Jew to perform certain tasks, such as to carry the Roman's
military baggage upon demand. Jesus, on the other hand, wanted His
people to be willing to go beyond the bare essentials of what the law
demanded of them: He wanted them to be willing to go ``the extra mile'';
and, by doing this, the Jew would also show by his actions that he was
being compelled by a power beyond that of the Roman law; rather, he was
being motivated by a power of love -- a power which also prompted humble
servitude and continual faithfulness toward that ultimate object of the
Christian's obedience, the Almighty God Himself.
In
similar fashion, Jesus instructed, ``And if anyone wants to sue you, and
take your shirt, let him have your coat also''
(Matt. 5:4).
Again, knowing the historical and cultural background of this will help
us to better understand the application; and that was that, generally
speaking, the Jew -- even the poorest of them -- would have more than
one change of ``shirt'' (``tunic'' or inner garment); but only one
``coat'' ( ``cloak'' or outer garment); and, according to the law, this
coat could not be kept over night by another who had received it as a
surety or pledge.
Exodus 22:26, 27 reads, ``If you ever take your neighbor's cloak
as a pledge, you are to return it to him before the sun sets, for that
is his only covering; it is his cloak for his body. What else shall he
sleep in? And it shall come about that when he cries out to Me, I will
hear him, for I am gracious.'' So, by right, this cloak could not be
permanently taken away; but Jesus is saying that the Christian needs to
be willing to forgo some of his rights -- to be able to give up at times
even those things which both God's Law and man's would allow.
This
certainly was the attitude of Paul. He said, ``Therefore, if food causes
my brother to stumble, I will never eat meat again, that I might not
cause my brother to stumble''
(1 Cor. 8:13).
The apostle was willing to give up that which he technically had the
right to, lest it caused another to fall.
One way
in learning to compromise in matters of indifference is by striving to
truly apply what Paul writes in
Philippians 2:3:
''...let each of you regard one another as more important than
himself.'' If we are esteeming one another the way God's word demands,
it should be much easier to yield to another's plan, wishes, or appeals,
out of deference for that individual. For we are to ``not merely look
out for'' our ``own personal interests, but also for the interests of
others'' (v. 4); and ''...we who are strong ought to bear the weaknesses
of those without strength and not just please ourselves. Let us each
please his neighbor for his good, to his edification. For even Christ
did not please Himself; but as it is written, `The reproaches of those
who reproached Thee fell upon Me'''
(Rom. 15:1-3).
Paul
strove to be ''...all things to all men'' that he might ''...by all
means save some'' (1
Cor. 9:19-23). In other words, as he states in the beginning of
this passage: ''...though I am free from all men, I have made myself a
slave to all, that I might win the more.''
But
this certainly does not mean that Paul was ever a man-pleaser in the
sense of compromising the truth of God's word, for to this he was
adamantly opposed
(Gal. 1:10; 2:5).
We need
to remember, as someone once said, real ``joy'' means putting...
Jesus first,
Others second, and
Yourself last.
Even
Jesus did not come into this world to be served, but rather to serve --
and to give His life as a ransom for all
(Matt. 20:28).
May we each strive to follow in His footsteps, to never
compromise in matters of faith; but to be able to not always be so
insistent on our own ways in matters of indifference. For as Christians,
we are to ``If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with
all men'' (Rom.
12:18). And as Paul also writes to the Ephesians, ``I, therefore,
the prisoner of the Lord, entreat you to walk in a manner worthy of the
calling with which you have been called, with all humility and
gentleness, with patience, showing forbearance to one another in love,
being diligent to preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of
peace'' (Eph.
4:1-3).
Yes,
this is the way in which we need to yield to one another.
Other Articles
Did the Early Church Observe the Lord's
Supper Daily?
Needful Preaching