That's what some are saying. In his book,
Unbroken Bread, Mike Root says: "Worship is a life given in obedience to
God. It's not a when or where proposition, but a what. It's what we are. You
can't go to it or leave it, dress for it or from it, and you can't start it
or stop it... it doesn't open and close with a prayer, and it doesn't have
human leader or a special day" (115).
Appealing To the Scripture
The New Testament clearly teaches that a
Christian is to present his body as "a living sacrifice" to God (Rom 12:1-2)
and do everything in the name of the Lord (Col 3:17) and to the glory
of God (1 Cor. 10:31). It is also true that a Christian can and
should worship God apart from those times when the church assembles together
(Acts 16:25; Heb.
13:15).
Does this mean, however, that all of life is worship?
Just a few examples in the Bible clearly
illustrate that all of life is not worship. Abraham told his servants that
he and Isaac would "go yonder and worship, and we will come back to you"
(Gen. 22:5). God told Moses to "come up to the Lord ... and worship from
afar" (Ex. 24:1). After the death of his son, David "went into the
house of the Lord and worshiped. Then he went to his own house ..." (2
Sam. 12:20).
The wise men came to Bethlehem to worship Jesus (Matt. 2:2) and when
they found him, they "fell down and worshiped Him" (Matt. 2:11).
John "fell at his feet to worship" the angel (Rev. 19:10; 22:8). The
Bible clearly teaches that worship has a beginning point (Matt. 8:2;
9:18; 14:33; 15:25; 28:9,17; Mark 5:6; John 9:38; Heb. 11:21) and an
ending point (Luke 24:52) and that worship does involve a "when" and
a "where" (John 12:20; Acts 8:27; 24:11).
In light of this kind of evidence, from
where does this "all-of-life-is-worship"
concept come? The proponents of this concept hang their hat on Paul's
statement: "Therefore I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to
present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is
your spiritual service of worship" (Rom. 12:1, NASB; cf. ESV,
NIV, NRSV). Other translations say "which is your reasonable service" (KJV,
NKJV) or "which is your spiritual service” (ASV).
Although the original word translated "spiritual service of worship" (latreia)
can refer to worship (Rom. 9:4; Heb. 9:1, 6), it more generally
refers to service (John 16:2; Luke 1:74). In fact, the verb form (latreuo)
is contrasted with the usual word for "worship" (proskuneo) (Matt.
4:10; Luke 4:8; Rom. 1:25),
suggesting a difference between the two. This evidence indicates that while
all of life is service, not all of life is worship.
What Is Behind the
All-Of-Life-Is-Worship Concept?
1. Informality.
Of the assembly in Troas (Acts
20:7), Mike Root says: "This 'first day of the week assembly was as
unstructured and informal as an unplanned reunion of college friends"
(Spilt Grape Juice, pp. 50-51).
Who says so? Luke certainly doesn't say anything like that, and since Paul
taught the same things in all the churches (1 Cor. 4:17;
7:17), there is every reason to
believe that the assembly in Troas followed the principles of decorum that
Paul taught the church in Corinth (1 Cor. 14:26-40).
2. Pep-rally religion.
For the promoters of the all-of-life-is-worship
concept, it's all about me (or to be as charitable as possible, it's
primarily about me); it's not about God. Root says: "Encouragement is the
glue that keeps us close, the rah-rah
that keeps us going, and the hook that keeps us coming back for more. It's a
drug we can't get enough of and a gift that we never tire of giving" (Spilt
Grape Juice, p. 73). The New Testament teaches, however, that worship is not
about me; it's all about God (Matt. 4:10; John 4:21-24; Rev. 14:6-7).
3. Eating together.
That sounds pretty innocent until you learn that this includes, in Root's
theology, the eating of a common meal when Christians assemble. All of this
despite the fact that Paul told the Corinthians, after they had turned the
Lord's Supper into a common meal, to "eat at home" (1 Cor. 11:22, 34).
4. An expanded role for women.
With a touch of sarcasm, Root writes,
... women can talk all they want before and
after those magical opening and closing prayers, because being silent in the
church is referring to the formal assembly. Five minutes before that opening
prayer, the same women in the same building, sitting in the same seats,
could comment, share, and edify others, simply because it was called "a
Bible class," and everyone knows that's not the same as the formal worship.
There is some sense of consistency in this; neither Bible classes nor formal
worship are found in the New Testament, so we can make up the rules as we go
(Unbroken Bread, p. 128).
Root suggests that Paul's restrictions on
women (1 Tim. 2:11-12; 1
Cor. 14:34-35) were "just
dealing with specific first century problems in Corinth and Ephesus"
(Unbroken Bread, p. 180); but in the context Paul instructs men "everywhere"
(1 Tim. 2:8) and his instructions for the Corinthians were the same
"as in all the churches of the saints" (1 Cor. 14:33-34,
ASV, ESV, NIV, NRSV). Others
argue that these restrictions were based on first-century
culture, and, therefore, have no application in twenty-
first-century America; but Paul
bases his restrictions on women on Creation (1 Cor. 11:7-9;
1 Tim. 2:13), the Fall
(1
Tim. 2:14) and the Law (1 Cor. 14:34)—three things that have
absolutely nothing to do with culture.
Brethren, some preachers are trying to
affect radical change in the church as we know it today The all-of-life-is-worship
concept is a step in that direction. This concept, however, lacks divine
foundation and must to be rejected.
kevinskay@mounet.com
Johnson City, TN
Biblical Insights, July 2006, Page 18-19