According to a
well-known American philosopher, "A man full of faith is simply one who
has lost (or never had) the capacity for clear and realistic thought"
[H.L. Mencken]; another one said, "What has religion to do with facts?
Nothing" [Robert Green Ingersoll]; and "Star Trek" creator and producer,
Gene Roddenberry, said, "For most people, religion is nothing more than
a substitute for a malfunctioning brain." This is what the world thinks
about people like you and me, who believe in God, that Jesus Christ was
real, that He was indeed the Son of God, and that he came down to earth
from heaven and died for our sins. According to these men, we are
mindless idiots who are incapable of reasoned thought and wouldn't know
the difference between black and white, up from down, or left from
right. Keep in mind, though, that God has said something about these
men, too (cf. Psa. 14:1). The world, as it is, will never see eye
to eye with God, and they never will (1 Cor. 1:20-31; 3:19).
You might be surprised
to learn, though, that some professing believers do not think much more
of you than these philosophers! A recent sad event involving a
formerly-sound brother in Christ exemplifies the attitude of some who
believe we should alter the doctrine of Jesus Christ to appease the
denominations; during the course of events that led to his abandonment
of the truth, he and his cohorts accused any who stand for truth as
those unwilling to think, who blindly followed "tradition", and who are
incapable of reading God's word, weighing it against other passages, and
coming to a sound, reasoned conclusion without the help of someone else.
Some have plainly stated that anyone who believes and teaches something
that happens to agree with the conclusions of many men who have preceded
them is guilty of teaching "tradition" rather than Scripture -
accusations that are more insinuation than actual facts.
The attempts are but
mere smoke and mirrors and the old "dog and pony show" that is thrown up
to deflect criticism of what they are actually teaching. No character
assassinations are needed to "ruin" them; they are committing spiritual
suicide when they purposefully leave behind the principles and commands
of our Lord for a false hope of some other doctrines our Lord did not
teach. May God be merciful enough to allow them time to come to their
senses and escape the snare of the devil before it is too late.
Contained within
several of these men's accusations is the charge that "we" [those in the
church] are not thinking, but merely following someone else who did the
thinking for us. The attempt is to paint the picture of what we follow
as "traditions of men" unworthy of belief and, once successful in that,
they then try to convince us that they are the only ones who have really
been "thinking" and what they teach is a "new approach" to the Bible
that is very much unlike what "we" are doing. [I.e., "My way is right
and yours is wrong."] It seems much of their effort is made to convince
us this is the case, because their writings sure are not convincing. A
short read of some of these men's writings shows logical and Scriptural
errors galore, with quite a few assumptions, presumptions, and arrogance
thrown in to top it off. I'd caution all to be very wary of any man who
says everything you ever learned is wrong and, at the same time, argues
that everything he says is right! One does not have to resort to
derogatory insinuations about someone else's doctrine if he really has
truth; truth is strong enough to stand on its own.
But let us not simply
pass over these slanderous accusations of this supposed lack of
thinking. Maybe you are not insulted by that, but I am and you should
be!
First of all, I think
it is a sad view of brethren to accuse the church, as a whole, of being
unwilling and incapable of thinking on their own.
Second, I just do not
believe it is true to say that everything we believe and teach is the
doctrine and traditions of men; I daresay very little, if any, of what
we do is "tradition" and much of what I do see as "traditional
practices" fall in the realm of indifferent matters that I have never in
my life heard brethren make out to be more than a local practice or just
something that the brethren in one particular location do in a
particular way. That fact is, the things these men are trying to label
as "tradition" are really based on reasoned study, interpretation, and
application of Scripture, and the only way they have around that is to
slander and falsely accuse adherents of ignorance and arrogance. That
method will forever be used by false teachers who have no leg on which
their doctrines can stand.
But God does expect us
to think. When Jesus commanded the apostles to go preach the gospel to
every creature, He followed that up by saying, "He who believes and
is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned"
(Mark 16:15,16). Jesus expected that those who heard the gospel
could use their brains and weigh the evidence presented by the apostles
and come to a logical and sound conclusion. He expected it, for He said
we will be either saved or condemned based on our response to it! John
wrote about the miracles of Jesus and plainly stated that it was enough
evidence to convince us Jesus was the Christ (John 20:30,31);
friends and brethren, it takes some thinking to read those things and
come to that conclusion, but it can be done! God is not so harsh that He
would give us incomprehensible words and then demand that we use our
brains to figure out what could not be solved or understood. God expects
us to think!
God also tells us, "Beloved,
do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of
God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world" (1
John 4:1). God expects us to not blindly accept and believe
everything that comes along, but that we should "test" the
spirits of men to see whether they are of God or of the world. Jesus
said earlier, "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's
clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by
their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from
thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree
bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree
bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down
and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them"
(Matt. 7:15-20). Is it coincidental that the very next thing
Jesus says is, "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall
enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in
heaven" (v. 21)? I think not!
You see, Jesus expects
us to be able to look at what a man is doing and what he is teaching and
make a sound and reasonable judgment as to whether it is of God or not.
Jesus expects that we will be able to tell the difference between truth
and error and we will be judged for having done [or not done] just that.
But how will we be able to judge rightly? Will it always be clear and
evident? No, sadly, many times it will not be so easy to distinguish
between truth and error, but not because we cannot know and understand
truth! Oftentimes, it is our own lack of desire to know the truth that
stands in the way of understanding spiritual truths. Sometimes we get
mentally lazy and do not study to comprehend or for the purpose of
personal application. It is then that we place ourselves in grave danger
of being led astray, but it does not have to be so. It should not be so,
for God expects us to think, to reason, and to understand.
It is a sad fact that
some men have forgotten the standard by which truth and error will be
judged, though. Some, seeking to promote themselves or their false
doctrines, have sought out "new" ways of looking at the Scripture [new
interpretations and new applications], and some have plainly abandoned
the Scriptures altogether.
I urge you to stick
with the word of God, friends and brethren, because it is there that you
will find truth and salvation. Hide it in your heart [your mind], study
it, live it, apply it, and teach it boldly.
Other Articles
Are You a Heretic?
Gluttony -- Is It a Sin?
Did the Early Church Observe the
Lord's Supper Daily?
Would you like
others to read this article?
Please share!