The Old Testament abounds with numerous examples that illustrate New
Testament principles, such as in
Leviticus 10:1,2,
in which the lesson is taught that God will not accept just any kind of
worship. It reads, ``Now Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took their
respective firepans, and after putting fire in them, placed incense on it
and offered strange fire before the Lord, which He had not commanded them.
And fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they
died before the Lord.'' What was this ``strange fire'' they used? According
to the text, it was simply a fire which God did not authorize--apparently,
fire from another source.
On the Day of Atonement, Aaron was to take ``a firepan full of coals of fire
from upon the altar...and...put the incense on the fire''
(Leviticus 16:12,13).
And, as
Leviticus 6:12,13
shows, the fire was to be kept burning continually upon the altar. For Aaron
to have, therefore, used some other source for fire, would have caused him
to violate God's word just as Nadab and Abihu had done.
When the Lord specifies a certain way for something to be performed, He
doesn't have to enumerate on all the ways in which it cannot be. For
example, when God told Noah to build an ark using gopher wood, this
automatically eliminated the use of any other kind. The Lord did not have to
say, ``And thou shalt not use hickory, cedar, cypress, walnut, maple,'' and
so.
This principle of ``specific commands'' is seen often in the Bible. Take,
for instance, the unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine that are to be
used in the Lord's Supper. By specifying these two elements--the former to
represent Christ's body, and the latter to represent His blood--the use of
anything else is automatically excluded. Therefore, to use something(s) in
addition to, or in place of, would be to profane the communion.
Most people realize this and would find it sacrilegious to add cake and ice
cream to the Lord's Supper or to substitute the fruit of the vine with Coke
or Pepsi, but why can't they also see this with regard to the music the
church is to use in worshiping God; It is to be a cappella, which is singing
without the accompaniment of instrumental music. This is because God has
specifically commanded His people to ``sing'' for this New Testament age and
has never included authority for using instruments in worship
(Col. 3:16).
Though the use of such was commanded during the Mosaical Period, this is
irrelevant to how we are to worship God during this Gospel Age in which we
now live. Today it is just the instrument of the heart that is to accompany
are singing in praise and worship to God
(Eph. 5:19).
In
Leviticus 10:3
the implication is made that Nadab and Abihu did not honor God, nor treat
Him as holy, because they chose to change God's plan and serve the Lord
their own way. Do we ever see this happening today? Unfortunately, we
do--and not just with instrumental music. Yet we do not have any more right
to tamper with God's word in our time than those who lived during the age of
Nadab and Abihu. We must search the Scriptures to learn of God's authority,
and respect that authority by humbling submitting to it through obedience.
May this lesson of Nadab and Abihu help us to not make the same mistake of
tampering with God's word--no matter how insignificant it might
seem--realizing that if we want to truly honor and worship the Lord, we must
do so His way and not our own.
Other Articles by Tom Edwards
Time is Swift
The
Pride that Blinds
The Essentiality of Belief in the
Resurrection
The Healing Power of Forgiveness
Learning to Yield to One Another
The Lord's Supper
For Past Auburn Beacons go to:
www.aubeacon.com/Bulletins.htm
|
Anyone can join the mailing list for the Auburn Beacon! Send
your request to:
larryrouse@aubeacon.com |