In
his defense before Agrippa, Paul asked his Jewish audience: “Why is it
judged incredible with you, if God doth raise the dead?”
(Acts 26:8).
There have
always been those who found the concept of the bodily resurrection
incredible, i.e., unbelievable, and their modern counterparts are appearing
increasingly—even in today’s church.
False Ideas
The ancient
Greeks disdained the notion that the body could ever be raised. Thus when
Paul spoke concerning “the resurrection of the dead [ones—plural]” in
Athens, his message was mocked
(Acts 17:32).
During the time of Jesus, the Sadducees denied the resurrection of the body
(Matthew 22:23; Acts 23:6-8).
Even some
Christians in the primitive church had fallen for this error and so
affirmed: “There is no resurrection of the dead”
(1 Corinthians 15:12)—a
heresy which Paul attempted to correct. In the late decades of the apostolic
age, a sect known as the Gnostics arose, denying the resurrection of the
body.
In our own age,
atheism, of course, rejects the idea that the human body will be raised from
the dead. An article in the Soviet Encyclopedia asserts that the concept of
the resurrection is in “decisive contradiction with scientific natural
knowledge” (Smith 1999, 455).
Religious
modernism repudiates the idea of the resurrection, since, having
“demythologized” the Scriptures, it rejects any element of the miraculous.
Cultish groups
also have a problem with the doctrine that God will raise the body. The
Jehovah’s Witnesses assert that the incorrigibly wicked “will never be
remembered for resurrection” (Make Sure of All Things 1953, 314).
Within the
churches of Christ, those who have converted to the dogma of Max King deny
the resurrection. Like Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who erred in Paul’s day,
these brethren suggest that the resurrection is past already
(2 Timothy 2:17, 18),
having been spiritually effected in A.D. 70 with the destruction of
Jerusalem (see The Menace of Radical Preterism).
Whether ancient
or modern, within the church or outside of it, the denial of the bodily
resurrection is radical error. And in this age of biblical illiteracy, this
false doctrine will continue to make its presence felt among the people of
God unless gospel preachers return to a teaching of the fundamental
principles of the Christian faith, one of which is the resurrection of the
dead
(cf. Hebrews 6:1, 2).
The Bible and the Resurrection
The Bible
clearly affirms the doctrine of the general resurrection of the dead. Note,
in brief, the following points.
Old Testament Evidence
The concept of
the resurrection is found in the Old Testament—though not as vividly as it
comes to light in the New Testament
(cf. 2 Timothy 1:10).
God’s declaration to Moses regarding Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was an
indication of the eventual resurrection
(Matthew 22:31, 32).
Other Old Testament passages also suggested that man’s body would be raised
ultimately
(see Job 19:25-27; Psalm 17:15; Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12:2;
Hosea 13:14).
New Testament Evidence
The doctrine of
the bodily resurrection is affirmed abundantly in the New Testament
(see John 5:28, 29; 6:39, 40; Mark 12:18-27; Acts 17:32;
26:8; Romans 8:23; 1 Thessalonians 4:16; 1 Corinthians 15; 2 Corinthians
5:1, 2; Philippians 3:21).
How any person
could read Paul’s great discussion of the eventual disposition of the dead
in
1 Corinthians 15
and not believe in the resurrection has to be one of the mysteries of the
ages. In that remarkable chapter the apostle develops his line of
argumentation in the following fashion:
(1) Paul
persuasively pled for the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ on the basis
of numerous eyewitnesses of the risen Lord, which, on one occasion,
consisted of more than five hundred people
(15:1-11).
(2) The apostle
maintained that the Lord’s resurrection is Heaven’s guarantee that we too
shall be raised. Jesus is the “first-fruits” (a figure suggesting a future
harvest) of the general resurrection to be effected at the time of his
return
(vv. 12-34).
(3) Paul
discussed the nature of the resurrected body. It will not be a physical or a
corruptible body; rather, it will be spiritual and incorruptible
(vv. 35-49).
Nevertheless, there will be an identity continuum between the former body
and the new one. Only in this light can the term “resurrection” (which means
to stand up) have any relevance.
Moreover, each
body will have its own individuality
(v. 38).
Further, it is thrilling to reflect upon the fact that our new bodies will
be identical in form to the glorious body of our resurrected Lord
(see Philippians 3:21).
(4) Finally,
the theological impact of the resurrection is set forth. It is a declaration
of victory
(vv. 50-57).
In view of this great hope, saints are admonished to persevere in their
fidelity
(v. 58).
The biblical
doctrine of the resurrection of the dead is a comforting concept. Those who
would rob us of this hope are not friends of the cause of Christ.
Other Articles by Wayne Jackson
False Ideals Regarding Death
Will Heaven be on
Earth?
Is the Restoration Plea
Valid?
Are We Under Law or Grace?
Apostasy - A Clear and Ever
Present Danger
Three
Dimensions of Love
What is Truth? A Question
for the Ages
The Challenge of Agape Love
That Mysterious Disciple
The Value of the Kingdom of Heaven
Did the Early Church Observe the
Lord's Supper Daily?
For Past Auburn Beacons go to:
www.aubeacon.com/Bulletins.htm
|
Anyone can join the mailing list for the Auburn Beacon! Send
your request to:
larryrouse@aubeacon.com |