I
like brown shoes, and wear them most of the time. However, if
you insist upon wearing black shoes I will argue the point. Go
right ahead! I'm a very tolerant man with respect to shoes.
But
some of my friends tell me I am intolerant in religious matters.
They can't understand why a kind hearted, tolerant fellow like
me would say they
must
obey God's commands and practice in religion
only
that which God has authorized. (Well, maybe that is the way they
put it.)
Some intolerance" is born of egotism-- self-loving individuals
who think they are the center of the universe, hence their ways
must be accepted by all. This is bad
(Jas. 4:11-12).
But there is an "intolerance" of a sort, which is born of love.
I love my granddaughter, and insist that she not eat the shoe
polish. (The brown, that is.) And there is an "intolerance" born
of respect for superior authority, and deep concern for those
who fail to respect that authority. Paul contended with the
Israelites frequently (a) because he loved them, and (b) because
he knew they could not be saved while they followed their own
erroneous ways.
It
is well and good to be tolerant in matters of indifference--and
in matters where the rights of men are equal. But to "tolerate"
sin and transgression of God's law is to assume the right to
"judge" that law (Jas.
2:9-f.)
or to relegate divine matters to the category of black and brown
shoes.
“Tolerance” is often a disguise for a lack of
concern! "
Other Articles
by Robert Turner
What Is Sectarian Baptism?
What Can We Know About Heaven?
Wishing for Sin
Young People's Program
Church Autonomy
The
Security of the Believer
What Went Forth?